User talk:Seringapatam

Welcome!
Hello, Seringapatam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Burmese–Siamese War (1563–1564), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Uberaccount (talk) 22:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Burmese–Siamese War (1563–1564)


The article Burmese–Siamese War (1563–1564) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uberaccount (talk) 22:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Burmese–Siamese War (1563–1564), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Several other articles meet the same criteria. The Determinator p  t  c  22:50, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Burmese–Siamese War (1584–1593)


The article Burmese–Siamese War (1584–1593) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not referenced, and not encyclopaedia-worthy

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uberaccount (talk) 23:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Battle of the Black hills


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Battle of the Black hills. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Great Sioux War of 1876. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Great Sioux War of 1876 – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  Protoss  Pylon  23:26, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Your recent new articles
Hello Seringapatam. I've performed cleanup on several new articles you have recently created. These include:
 * Burmese–Siamese War (1613–1614)
 * Burmese–Siamese War (1662–1664)
 * Burmese–Siamese War (1563–1564)
 * Burmese–Siamese War (1675–1676)
 * Battle of the Horsefly
 * Battle of the Missouri River
 * Konbaung–Mrauk-U War (1784)
 * Burmese–Manipuri War (1763–1764)

In your submissions, please be sure to include reliable sources to verify content, use proper capitalization and grammar (see Basic copyediting for some tips), format articles per Wikipedia's Manual of style, and add categories and internal links. Thanks you for your consideration regarding this important matter. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Burmese–Manipuri War (1770). Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. - MrX 01:02, 8 March 2013 (UTC)


 * We really appreciate your enthusiasm for creating content. You have created many new, very short, unreferenced articles for subjects that are already covered in Military history of Burma. Please consider expanded that article if you have new content with references. Then, if you have a substantial amount of new content, a new article can be created. Also, I suggest you have look at WP:FIRST, which explains how to properly create your first article. Best wishes - MrX 01:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Noukouma


The article Battle of Noukouma has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no WP:reliable sources. No indication of WP:notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:29, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Siege of Khotin (1788)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Siege of Khotin (1788). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Siege of Khotyn. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Siege of Khotyn – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 19:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Battle of Mogadishu (1775)
Hi, I'm Sosthenes12. Seringapatam, thanks for creating Battle of Mogadishu (1775)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi! Check out Help:Cheatsheet for proper referencing coding.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ways to improve Battle of Mogadishu (1767)
Hi, I'm Sosthenes12. Seringapatam, thanks for creating Battle of Mogadishu (1767)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consult Help:Cheatsheet for the proper way to place references. Also, Please use proper citation style rather than just using an ISBN number. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ways to improve Ethiopian Civil War (1770)
Hi, I'm Sosthenes12. Seringapatam, thanks for creating Ethiopian Civil War (1770)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consult Manual of Style for proper writing and citation technique. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ways to improve Battle of Mogadishu (1755)
Hi, I'm Sosthenes12. Seringapatam, thanks for creating Battle of Mogadishu (1755)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consult Manual of Style for proper writing and citation technique. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ways to improve Battle of Tsavo
Hi, I'm Sosthenes12. Seringapatam, thanks for creating Battle of Tsavo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consult Manual of Style for proper citing and writing techniques. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ways to improve Battle of Mogadishu (1729)
Hi, I'm Sosthenes12. Seringapatam, thanks for creating Battle of Mogadishu (1729)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consult Manual of Style for proper citing and writing techniques. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ways to improve Siege of Anapa (1791)
Hi, I'm Sosthenes12. Seringapatam, thanks for creating Siege of Anapa (1791)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consult Manual of Style for proper citation and writing technique. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Battles of the Cypress Hills, Seringapatam!

Wikipedia editor DCI2026 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The article needs to be well-sourced. You can use citation templates (available through the Cite tab in the editing window) to do this. Further book sources would assist in ascertaining the notability of this subject."

To reply, leave a comment on DCI2026's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Inuit capture of HMS Bout,1780


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Inuit capture of HMS Bout,1780, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   17:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of the Ice Dunes


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of the Ice Dunes, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   17:54, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Thanks for contributing the new article Battle of Gand. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at New contributors' help page, or just ask me. ''Many of your articles are unsourced, and there is no indication that many of the facts are accurate or notable. Please refrain from adding unsourced, unsourceable, or factually errant content.'' dci  &#124;  TALK   17:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Alligator Swamp


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Alligator Swamp, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   17:58, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Gand
Hello, Seringapatam. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Battle of Gand, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, dci  &#124;  TALK   17:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Albanian revolt of 1760
Hello Seringapatam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Albanian revolt of 1760 for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, dci  &#124;  TALK   18:02, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Battle of Wadgaon, Seringapatam!

Wikipedia editor DCI2026 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"This page needs sources."

To reply, leave a comment on DCI2026's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Battles of Edo
Hello Seringapatam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battles of Edo for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, dci  &#124;  TALK   18:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Comanche-Osage wars
Hello Seringapatam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Comanche-Osage wars for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, dci  &#124;  TALK   18:13, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Revolts of 1772


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Revolts of 1772 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. dci &#124;  TALK   18:14, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1781 Aden uprising


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as 1781 Aden uprising, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   18:18, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Mogadishu (1755)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Mogadishu (1755), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   18:23, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Apla Swamp


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Apla Swamp, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   18:23, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Grand Monteau
Hello, Seringapatam. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Battle of Grand Monteau, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, dci  &#124;  TALK   18:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of the Desert


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of the Desert, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   18:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

AIV
This account has been reported at WP:AIV. Seringapatam, you seem to be devoting a significant amount of time and energy to the creation of hoax articles. Note that this does not' cover articles made in good faith that have been speedily deleted. dci &#124;  TALK   18:34, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Askum


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Askum, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   18:35, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Warning
Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. INeverCry  19:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cattle war


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Cattle war, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   20:06, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Cattle war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You have been warned above by INeverCry regarding this editing pattern. Further hoaxes will result in another report at AIV and a likely block, so please, please desist.'' dci  &#124;  TALK   20:07, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I had already blocked the user before this was given. Considering that these hoaxes were following each other at intervals of only a few minutes, I decided to block. This user needs to stop with the hoaxes, and slow down generally and create articles with WP:RS that how WP:N.  INeverCry   20:16, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Taras
Hello, Seringapatam. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Battle of Taras, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, dci  &#124;  TALK   20:10, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Fort Quincolo
Hello Seringapatam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battle of Fort Quincolo for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, dci  &#124;  TALK   20:11, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for creating hoaxes after warning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. INeverCry  20:13, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chinese-Japanese invasion of Korea (1791)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chinese-Japanese invasion of Korea (1791), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   21:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Wollofa


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Wollofa, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   21:30, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Mogadishu (1767)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Mogadishu (1767), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   21:33, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Mogadishu (1780)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Mogadishu (1780), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   21:33, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Mogadishu (1775)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Mogadishu (1775), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   21:34, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Mogadishu (1729)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Mogadishu (1729), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   21:34, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Tsavo


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Tsavo, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   21:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saudi attack on Baghdad


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Saudi attack on Baghdad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. dci &#124;  TALK   21:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ethiopian Civil War (1770)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ethiopian Civil War (1770), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   21:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battles of the Cypress Hills


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battles of the Cypress Hills, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dci &#124;  TALK   21:55, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Corscian-Genoa war 1755


A tag has been placed on Corscian-Genoa war 1755, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

''Information is not of any significance independently, nor is it historically accurate. One of a pattern of hoaxish articles.''

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. dci &#124;  TALK   21:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Siege of Basra (1776-1779)


The article Siege of Basra (1776-1779) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Battle not notable enough to merit separate article; there is hardly sufficient info and no real need for an unverifiable stub.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. dci &#124;  TALK   02:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC)