User talk:SeriousThinker

Welcome!
Hello, SeriousThinker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Audrius Nakas did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vytautas Matulevičius


The article Vytautas Matulevičius has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. — Amkgp 💬  14:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Vytautas Matulevičius
Hello, SeriousThinker. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vytautas Matulevičius, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vytautas Matulevičius


Hello, SeriousThinker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vytautas Matulevičius".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dalia Grybauskaitė, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delfi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nida Vasiliauskaitė. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ♥ Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) ♥ 21:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

I believe you'll have to be more specific than that. I don't see how my edits could be interpreted as "vandalism". Edit: I looked into this particular case about those instances of vandalism you're referring to, and I can assure you I have nothing to do with them. SeriousThinker (talk) 21:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Dalia Grybauskaitė
 * added a link pointing to The Insider
 * Gitanas Nausėda
 * added a link pointing to Delfi

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Partitions
Current naming is accepted consensus based on the English literature. If you want to change it, start a discussion on the talk page Marcelus (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Romualdas Ozolas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delfi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Lithuanian monarchy category
Hi, I noticed that you are adding biographical articles of Lithuanian monarchs to the category "Lithuanian monarchy". Don't you think that better solution would be to add category "Category:Lithuanian monarchs" to category "Lithuanian monarchy", since it already consists all the biographies? Marcelus (talk) 14:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I see, I will take out articles from "Lithuanian monarchy" relating to monarchs. The issue is that, following the analogical examples of articles about other countries, the title "Lithuanian monarchs" is not as broad to include institutional articles as well. Either "Lithuanian monarchs" should be renamed to "Lithuanian monarchy", thus making it broader or we should keep them separate, but the red line is not exactly clear here. --SeriousThinker (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2022 (BST) SeriousThinker (talk) 15:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I absolutely believe that both categories should exist. Only the category "Lithuanian monarchs" should be a sub-category of the category "Lithuanian monarchy". And biographies should be in the "Lithuanian monarchs" category, it just seems logical to me. Marcelus (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rulers of Lithuania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

List of rulers of Lithuania
Don't you think the rulers listed should have names in the form generally accepted on Wikipedia? I.e. Casimir IV Jagiellon and not Kazimieras Jogailaitis? We should use the forms that are accepted in English literature Marcelus (talk) 23:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vytautas Landsbergis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delfi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lithuanian Family Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CNE.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Elections in the Lithuanian SSR
Template:Elections in the Lithuanian SSR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Lithuanian nobility
Edit-warring there again. I feel the only way forward is reporting it. 37.34.79.116 (talk) 19:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, SeriousThinker. Thank you for your work on Swedish Lithuania. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   07:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Balto-Slavic
Balto-Slavic is well accepted within Indo-European linguistics. If you don't accept that, I don't think you're worthy of the username "SeriousThinker" Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:34, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * It's not for you to decide what I am worthy of. SeriousThinker (talk) 20:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, you're little better than a vandal then. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you want to pester someone because you have nothing better to do, I suggest finding someone else. I have no interest in listening to your worthless moral lectures. SeriousThinker (talk) 21:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Lithuania

 * Thank you for the offer, I'll keep that in mind. SeriousThinker (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Please
Generally your edits are good, but you unfortunately misjudged with the article Aukštaitija and renaming it to Austechia. First off, the grounds on which you did that were wrong. To rename such an article with an established name, you must provide reasoning. Considering Aukštaitija is the standard name compared to Austechia, that's what the article should be called. Please do not be disheartened by my reverts and in fact I encourage you to edit more, but please avoid rash changes like renaming articles with established names to little-known alternatives. Have a good day! Cukrakalnis (talk) 18:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I actually did present reasoning when I did the move this article, it's in the history view. It simply makes zero sense to me referring to one ethnographic region in its Latin form (Samogitia) and then referring to the other one in Lithuanian (Aukštaitija). I'm not sure why that should be the case — both Samogitia or Samethia and Austechia appear to be historical names but one of them is no longer suitable? Also, it should be noted that Austechia was the actually the origin title of this article when it was first created, but then somebody decided to change it at some point. SeriousThinker (talk) 11:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Austechia is not similar to Samogitia due to the latter being a far more frequently used word for the region in English-language literature than the former. Even Endre Bojtar refers to the region in his book primarily with its Lithuanian name Aukštaitija and not Austechia, which he only mentions in passing. Cukrakalnis (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I am aware that Aukštaitija is quite a frequently use term, that's why I kept it next to Austechia. I figured that Austechia could be more acceptable to English-speaking audiences as it is more easy to pronounce and has no special characters, but I do see your point. In that case, we can leave it at that. SeriousThinker (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for understanding and cordiality Cukrakalnis (talk) 21:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking your time and investigating my reasoning behind certain edits without jumping to unnecessary hasty conclusions. I truly appreciate that. SeriousThinker (talk) 11:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Swedish Lithuania for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swedish Lithuania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Swedish Lithuania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Marcelus (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into East Baltic languages. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. signed,Rosguill talk 22:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Prince Inigo of Urach for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prince Inigo of Urach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Prince Inigo of Urach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Marcelus (talk) 22:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)