User talk:Serols/Archive 13

DerSpiegelNein's edits
I don't think DerSpiegelNein should be banned yet...looks like editor is new and does not know that they should include edit summaries. OkayKenG (talk) 07:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, never mind. OkayKenG (talk) 07:51, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Clarification please
Hi Serols-can you please specify what in my edit of the Key Bridge page constitutes vandalism? I added easily verifiable historical information. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthpatrol2 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 5 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello contribs, everything already exists on your talk-pag. --Serols (talk) 15:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

House Mouse
Thanks for helping me out on reverting the 'RAT! Treated like dirt by many admins since 2016 DEAD RAT! GET LOST YOU DEAD RAT!' edits on the house mouse page. Do you know how to protect the page or ban the vandalizing editor? BlacknoseDace (talk) 15:20, 14 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello BlacknoseDace, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. It looks like he's blocked now. BlacknoseDace (talk) 15:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

on vandalism
Hello Serlos

I found message as my changes being vandalism without further details. While per guidelines it can be a link vandalism only if the link is "disruptive, irrelevant, or inappropriate targets while disguising them with mislabeling".

my changes were immediately reverted by yours when posted without any verification of content as per guidelines and tagged as vandalism. Was it automated ? Do you mind cancelling reverting after content verification ?

Rbtcpn (talk) 15:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC) rbtcpn


 * Hello Rbtcpn, please note Weblinks. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:13, 22 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Serlos


 * Thanks for External link information.
 * I gone through it and still did not found anything relates to vandalism about info I put up in link.
 * I was considering to edit it again with same link. Would you consider to remove it again if yes then can you be specific if it ::is not personal ?


 * Thanks! Rbtcpn (talk) 19:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC) rbtcpn


 * Hello Rbtcpn, link spam is vandalism. Please take the warnings on your talk page seriously, otherwise you risk your account. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Serlos
 * you are keep defending your revert and being unreasonable. I still have not re-added and you have already made the case of link spam vandalism.
 * while you are still failed to mentioned the original blame of 'vandalism' by definition. However the rule of vandalism is still not changed.
 * Can you un-automate default mode of 'my argument is undeniable' for reverting any edits with 'vandalism' tag spicing with account risk threats and discuss the real talk ?
 * Any response without mentioning "disruptive, irrelevant, or inappropriate" part of revert back could be considered as agreed to original edit.
 * Rbtcpn (talk) 14:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC) rbtcpn
 * Hello Rbtcpn, you got all the answers, also on your talk page. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:59, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
That was fun.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC) 

Removal of unreferenced material
Hi, I think you are being a bit quick with the rollback feature. How do you looked at the edit comments you would see why I removed this material. It has zero sources. If this is a topic you are knowledgeable on please return the material with sources. In the meantime I shall re-edit. Springnuts (talk) 08:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Having looked a bit further, ( burial at sea) you put the message on the wrong talk page. You reverted an IP edit. However, my edit did reverse your edit so if you wish to restore material please do. However, please add sources. Otherwise it is likely to be removed again as original research. Springnuts (talk) 08:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Springnuts, you reverted a nonsense edit and and then you correct yourself. Regards --Serols (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Serols - Life's too short. Springnuts (talk) 14:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

AIV report
Thanks for your work reverting and reporting vandalism, however this edit which you reported to AIV looks like a good faith addition of sourced content to me. Could you please explain why you believe this is vandalism in case I am missing something? – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 18:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

You are supporting Inaccuracy on The Dover Boys
Why are you undoing edits to The Dover Boys article?

The anachronism can be verified in 10 seconds, yet it stands thanks to your reverts! Better to have a note than to be wrong!

If it is formatted improperly, fix that, but you are supporting obvious inaccuracies and degrading the usefulness of Wikipedia by lording over a page without benefit of fact.

From Wikipedia: “Not all edits by new or unregistered contributors are vandalism. Check out the content added or removed before reverting blindly, and remember not to bite the newcomers.”

Reporting others for vandalism without following Wikipedia Guidelines (ie reverting blindly without making clear your reasoning, and falsely accusing others of vandalism) is hypocritical.

Please help fix the problem, don’t be the problem. This kind of activity unfortunately reinforces an unfair stereotype of the know-it-all unyielding Wikipedia Editor who lords over the page and edits by ego and rollback button, rather than accuracy and community.


 * Hello 67.52.153.5, see here. --Serols (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

−
 * We did see that link. It is unintelligible. As was stated previously, you can keep linking to here but it does not link to anything that explains what you did. Your behavior is abusive and contrary to stated Wikipedia goals and policy. Actions should be explainable and beneficial, and when you hide behind auto reverts and links to non-explanations you do us all a disservice. Take the time to do the job fairly and responsibly or step aside.


 * Please have the show the strength of conviction to explain your actions instead of cowardly rolling back criticism.


 * Your posts were not relevant for Wikipedia and also edit war, so please stop with your harassment. --Serols (talk) 07:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright Infringement
I am the sole copyright holder of all exploitation, distribution and intellectual rights worldwide to the film The Virgin Queen of St. Francis High. I have attempted to make corrections to the page, but you have blocked me. Remove your block so that I may make the proper corrections. If you refuse, just remove the entire page completely. Otherwise you are infringing on my rights.

Hello Copyright123, please use references, without that will be changed again soon. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

What do you mean by "use references"?
 * Please read WP:SOURCE--Mr Fink (talk) 19:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Have attempted several times to edit the page to correct the information you insist on retaining. Provide your attorney contact details. We will now pursue legal action to get this situation rectified.


 * User has been blocked. --Serols (talk) 11:09, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Why this revision
Hi! I am Soratako ( talk ). I cant't understand this reversion. Please be more specific about it? Japanese part of the translating were comment out.--Soratako ( talk ) 18:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Soratako, this is Wikipedia En - please use English. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I understood it now.--Soratako ( talk ) 07:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Why are you reverting my edits?
FROM Richosr:

Why are you removing my edit Land Beyond Productions produced Ben's video and the link is to the video produced and is valid.

What is the point of Wikipedia if you cannot link to valid content?


 * Hello Richosr, see your talk page. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Serols, you probably know this already, but I have had a little try at Talk:Ben Wilson (artist). I'm somewhat about to be overtaken by events IRL, so will be around less than I would like, but I hope this might have helped a bit. Cheers DBaK (talk) 14:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello DBaK, thank you for the information. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 15:46, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

About the edit
I am sorry, I thought I was in the Sandbox. I am new, I tried to edit it back though so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dabbawiki (talk • contribs) 18:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

What
There not vandalism Bedrooms60 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Bedrooms60, see your talk page. --Serols (talk) 07:55, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Illinois State Toll Highway Authority
Hi Serols. The information in the agency overview sidebar is outdated. Elizabeth Gorman hasn't been the executive director since March 2019. She was succeeded by Jose Alvarez in April.

The current numbers for employees and revenues are in the Tollway's 2019 Budget. I should have added the citation right away. I'm new at this, so I didn't realize edits would be reversed so quickly. Thank you.

Regards,

Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Illinois Tollway (talk • contribs) 17:53, 29 August 2019 (UTC)


 * User was blocked. --Serols (talk) 06:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Patience
Hey Serols,

Please be patient with first time editors. Honest editing mistakes happen.

Regards,

Satyanarayan Satyanarayan101 (talk) 13:44, 31 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Satyanarayan101, I deleted the warning. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for doing that
Hi! I really need to thank you for that. It was a mistake I made when I was going to press the Publish button, the removal button for the inbox got mistakenly tapped from my touchscreen. I also did message I JethroBT and ColinFine to revert it back. But as you've just did it, it seems all is good now. Thanking you again. Absol069 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:03, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi
apparently you didn't notice that I'd already indef blocked Bigpapijohn20000, because you warned him after I'd already blocked him. You might want to slow down and check the talk page and block log before warning. Killer Chihuahua 18:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Killer, thank you for the information. The warning was via Huggle, I could not see that. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not a huggle user, but you can always look at the page before issuing a warning regardless of whether you use twinkle or huggle or just edit the page directly. Cheers, Killer Chihuahua 18:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Killer, normally huugle will not allow any more warning, obviously this does not work right now. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I did not know that! Thanks, I learned something. You might want to talk to whoever is currently maintaining Huggle, then. It might just have been a glitch, but it might be something they can fix. Killer Chihuahua 18:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Killer, I wrote it down. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 18:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

How do you revert edits so fast? By the time I see a page's edit history, you've already reverted something. I just want to say thank you for all your hard work. ∞southernkangaroo ∞ talk∞ 17:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Serols deserves a barnstar. Or a dozen. Drmies (talk) 17:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * True. ∞southernkangaroo ∞ talk∞ 17:44, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello ∞southernkangaroo</b> ∞, with the program Huggle. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 17:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Huggle? I did manage to download it, but it didn't launch. You must use something other than a Mac. ∞<b style="color:sandybrown">southern</b><b style="color:burlywood">kangaroo</b> ∞ <b style="color:peru">talk</b>∞ 18:14, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

RE: Badshah (rapper)
Please take a look at Badshah (rapper), I think it is vandalism. However, in the spirit of avoiding the three revert rule, I will not participate in reverting the changes. Thanks! Hurricane111 (talk) 17:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Hurricane111, I agree with you. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Catholic University of Leuven
The French text of the medal is reinstallation, as you can read : In 1909, the Catholic University celebrated its 75th anniversary, and struck a medal where for the first time it officially used the French word "réinstallation" (ressetlement), and the Dutch word "herstelling" (restoration) beginning of a new "official" history : 75e ANNIVERSAIRE DE LA RÉINSTALLATION DE L’UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE 75e VERJAARDAG van de HERSTELLING des KATHOLIEKE HOOGESCHOOL 1834-1909. Who is the problem ? Thank you for your attention.--Viator (talk) 07:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Viator, the problem -> you do not use capitalization and lowercase, I've written that to you twice on your talk page --Serols (talk) 07:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * the official medal is so written, but, if you agree, I can change the text, is that good so :

75e ANNIVERSAIRE DE LA RÉINSTALLATION DE L’UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE 75e VERJAARDAG VAN DE HERSTELLING DES KATHOLIEKE HOOGESCHOOL 1834-1909. It is interesting to see that the frenc word "reinstallation" is not totally the same as the Dutch word "herstelling" (repair, restoration) Thank you--Viator (talk) 08:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Viator, if this is official, please use a reference and everything is fine. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:08, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, here a reproduction and retranscription of the medal with the official French an Dutch text :

--Viator (talk) 08:13, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Viator, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Serols, a big thank you for your understanding. --Viator (talk) 08:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Viator, please excuse my stubbornness. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:33, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem, it's a sign of passion for perfection on Wikipedia.--Viator (talk) 10:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Viator, thanks, have a nice day. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 10:44, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Your AIV report of 5.150.99.73
It looks like he edit-conflicted with the vandal / your reversion and restored the vandalism accidentally. His other edits are all reverts of vandalism. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Reaper Eternal, edit war with nonsense edit, harassment and vandalism. --Serols (talk) 14:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The first edit isn't vandalism and thus should not be rolled back. The second, as I already mentioned, looks to be an attempt at fixing the CSS code, but he edit-conflicted with your revert and accidentally restored another user's vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * For nothing the IP was not blocked. --Serols (talk) 07:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Westminster Bank vandal
You beat me to reverting him and warning him. (insert grumpy face). Tknifton (talk) 17:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Tknifton, how can I comfort you?. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:38, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It's happened again on anne hegerty (you beating me to reverting and warning that is). :) Tknifton (talk) 18:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Tknifton, I promise improvement. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2019 (UTC)