User talk:Serols/Archive 17

Note
Hi Serols. Heh, I can see how this mistake happened, but I wanted to let you know that this edit was not actually vandalism. Indeed, Apple's Twitter account really was hacked. The article is probably better with the edit reverted, though. Mz7 (talk) 17:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Mz7,thank you for the information, I changed my editing. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:03, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Note
Why are you vanadalising and writing misinformation about an Indian dish which clearly not british. [User:Raghavway121]] 24 July 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raghavway121 (talk • contribs) 09:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Raghavway121, please note, you have your last warning, you risk your account. --Serols (talk) 09:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Serols, please explain what is wrong with the edit? --User:Raghavway121 (talk) 2:53 PM, 24 July 2020 (IST) —Preceding undated comment added 09:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Raghavway121, incomprehensible deletion of entire sections. --Serols (talk) 09:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Serols], the info was unnecessary, that dish was invented in India, I do not think so such sections should exist in the first place. --Serols (talk) 24 July 2020 (IST) —Preceding undated comment added 09:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Raghavway121, without stating sources delete entire sections is vandalism and you risk your account. --Serols (talk) 10:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

apology
should have seen the quacking duck no WP:RS for changes, sorry JarrahTree 08:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Peter Hitchens
Hi Serols, please could you contribute to the COVID topic at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Peter_Hitchens? A previous change had been undone by you without explanation and so we are seeking consensus to move forward. Thanks! Men2ge4zhong3 (talk) 12:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Men2ge4zhong3, please be careful, you risk your account. --Serols (talk) 13:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Serols, please can you explain this threat? Above we politely brought to your attention a topic where we are seeking to reach consensus on an edit you reverted without explanation. Men2ge4zhong3 (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Men2ge4zhong3, you know what I mean. --Serols (talk) 13:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Serols, this does not clarify your threat I am afraid. We have asked what you require to reach consensus on a change you reverted without explanation. Your response so far as been to threaten us. Please can you explain? We are seeking consensus on the editing issue, and clarification on your threat. Men2ge4zhong3 (talk) 13:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Men2ge4zhong3, edit war and reverting whole sections without source is not a consensus. So the discussion is finished. --Serols (talk) 13:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Serols, please be assured our intention is not 'edit war' and our edits have been in good faith - and explained in comments. I am afraid your threatening behaviour here, and your reversion of edits without explanation (which we see others users have raised with you above in the past), are still not explained. Moving forward, there are two open questions on the talk page: one is how we can remove, or drastically reduce, a section which is not properly cited and reads like Peter's personal website; the other is how to restore an anti-vaxxer section, citing 2001 and 2013 pieces by Peter referenced on the British Medical Journal website. I hope to gain your support (or reach the necessary consensus, if you are simply neutral) on both counts. The intention was never to 'edit war', and if we look back I hope you will find I have sought explain all my edits with clear notes. Men2ge4zhong3 (talk) 13:19, 29 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Men2ge4zhong3, accusing me of a threat is a cheek. My request to be careful was meant amicably. Please accept that the discussion is over for me. --Serols (talk) 17:15, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

82.0.165.10 (talk) 09:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC) Hi Serols, stopped by as you'd had to put right some vandalism by one of my family and I wanted to talk about it. If I might weigh in as a third party, I'd like to say that "please be careful, you risk your account" is easily interpreted as a threat. I think it's one of those times when friendly intent is difficult to discern through the medium of ascii text.


 * Hello 82.0.165.10, that was actually not wrong to understand, he had already got a block. If he had listened to me, he would probably still have his account. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Köppen climate classification
Köppen climate classification says Cfb = oceanic climate, not Subtropical highland climate (which is Cwb).

What kind of person are you to just tell people 'first warning for your edit'?

Warning of what? Correcting a mistake on the page? Thank you for putting the mistake back again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.199.241.25 (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello 114.199.241.25, please use sources. --Serols (talk) 11:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Revert
Hi Serols, I accidentally rolled back your edits at Yasir Hussain. They got tangled up in some vandalism. I've restored the article back to where it should be, but thought I'd drop a note because you'll have gotten a notification that your edits were reverted. My apologies, and happy editing! Jip Orlando (talk) 14:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Stop Reverting
Stop reverting accurate edits like the one I made to the Nandamuri Balakrishna page 147.12.163.252 (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello 147.12.163.252, stop with your vandalism. --Serols (talk) 11:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

19/20 NBA season
- in East Conf table - Milwaukee Bucks should have an * next to their name - Miami Heat should have an * next to their name - Pacers should NOT have an * next to their name - in West Conf table - LA Lakers should have an * next to their name - LA Clippers should NOT have an * next to their name

-Games Behind in both Conferences is wrong

-Notes should include 'pi' to denote clinched play in spot and should be shown beside Memphis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.225.227.34 (talk) 11:34, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello 165.225.227.34, no questions in the article, use the talk page. --Serols (talk) 11:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Warning vandals
Thanks for helping out with the vandalism currently happening with the Calgary Flames article. If you want to try using the templates from Template index/User talk namespace on the talk pages of vandals it can save you some time. Deadman137 (talk) 07:35, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Concerning Alaeddin Pasha
Hello, I just wanted some clarification on an edit I made to Alaeddin Pasha. I had put a note as to why I had changed it, and I was wondering why my edit was considered quote "not constructive" and then undone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.2.147.201 (talk) 16:09, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello 160.2.147.201 you deleted the whole infobox. --Serols (talk) 16:56, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry
I am very sorry at that. I will not do that again. Rdp060707 (talk) 07:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Rdp060707, one is ok and I am happy, but more than ten in a few minutes is a little bit annoying. Have a good day. --Serols (talk) 08:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

The part about Christine was true
I made some statements about Sissi, Carrie, and Arthur as they relate to Joe Biden that I probably couldn't find a source for, but the part about Christine, disgusting as it is, was absolutely true. I had that show on in the background while editing, and it has some very disturbing content. As such, I believe my edit should stand in order to warn viewers of the subject matter thereof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.222.52.76 (talk) 08:17, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Dillian Whyte vs Alexander Povetkin result
The BoxRec link that is being used as a source to call the result a TKO actually states the result as a KO. I am not vandalising the pages in any way, shape or form. Grow up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.17.198.204 (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello 78.17.198.204, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The official result per BBBofC is a "technical count out", as announced by Diamante. Technical count out is a technical knockout. Somebody changed the initial (and correct) result on BoxRec from TKO to KO. Somebody with more knowledge has changed the result back to a TKO. Per the BBBofC's rules and regulations from their official website (found here):


 * 3.32 Should a Boxer go down to the floor as the result of a legitimate blow, the Timekeeper shall count off the seconds strictly in accordance with his watch. The opponent shall retire immediately to the furthest neutral corner and neither Boxer shall resume boxing until ordered to do so by the Referee.


 * 3.33.3 A Referee shall have the power to interrupt the count where he considers that a fallen Boxer is in need of urgent medical attention and in such cases the opponent shall be declared the winner by a technical count out (T.C.O.). – 2 . O . Boxing  13:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

ANI
Yo! An IP reported you to ANI: Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I think it can pretty much be ignored, but letting you know.--Chuka Chief (talk) 16:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Chuka Chief, thank you for this information. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Name change to NatureScot
My organisation has changed it's name from Scottish Natural Heritage to NatureScot as of 24 August 2020. My attempts to edit the page have been reverted by you. Please allow me to correct the information on the page or let me know what process I need to follow to have this corrected. NatureScotMedia (talk) 15:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello NatureScotMedia, please note the article name and your edit are unsourced. Please create a new articel with the new name (with source) and create a redirect in the old one. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Serols I did add a source in the most recent edit and there is already a source in the page as it stands from last year stating that these changes are coming. NatureScotMedia (talk) 16:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello NatureScotMedia, no source and your link is 404. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Malietoa Moli Portrait
The protrait o Malietoa Moli is not correct, that is a protrait of Malietoa Vaiinupo as painted by the USS Agate you can google that online. Please stop spreading misleading information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tafaifa (talk • contribs) 12:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Tafaifa, if you delete the infobox again, you risk your account. Change the portait (with source) but don´t delete the infobox. --Serols (talk) 12:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

I am not sure how to do that change the source or portrait but leave the info, if you could kindly assit me in that direction should u wish would be most appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tafaifa (talk • contribs) 12:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


 * You would have better listened to me, now you've lost your account. --Serols (talk) 13:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

User:Anonymous Bond
I have just blocked Anonymous Bond for edit warring; however, from what I can see, his edits were not vandalism and, as such, your reverts were inappropriate. Granted, his edits were unhelpful and I wouldn't be surprised if further sanctions end up being needed in the futur; however, the point remains that your use of rollback in this instance was suboptimal. Salvio 10:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Salvio, thank you for the information. Such edits be made only to inflame tensions the conflict between India and Pakistan and have no place in an Encyclopedia. Have a nice day --Serols (talk) 13:47, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Barcelona Gipsy balKan Orchestra
Hi,

I updated the member list of this band and removed the part about rotating nomad musicians. This is all information you can verify on their official website. I'm not sure why you would want to revert to false information ...

The Minimalist Man (talk) 14:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello The Minimalist Man, please use sources and note the article name. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi
Hi I am not. A vandalism Pooolbooolnoool (talk) 13:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Pooolbooolnoool, please note, this was your last warning on your talk page. --Serols (talk) 13:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Warning
Stop Disrupting "His Judgement Cometh and that Right Soon....." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.15.15.162 (talk) 08:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please stop your vandalism. --Serols (talk) 08:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Art in the Protestant Reformation and Counter-Reformation
Hi, I tried to fix an old vandalism error in the above article, but seem to have made a mess. Can you help? I have to go to work now. Sorry to disturb you. Thanks, Denisarona (talk) 15:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Denisarona, you are not disturbing, quite the opposite. Sorry, I restored the version of Materialscientist. The next edits from the IP were also vandalism. Please check whether my processing is ok. Wish you a nice weekend --Serols (talk) 15:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

List of ABS-CBN drama series
Hi can you revert all edits by User: 130.105.10.252 because all edits are Harassment and Vandalism, thank you very much my Friend. Jangmi20 (talk) 16:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Kahit Minsan Lang
Hi! can you revert User: 122.52.45.198 because all its edits are untrue and unsourced, thank you very much Friend. Jangmi20 (talk) 00:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Naomi Ishisaka
Unfortunately, the creator mixed two different people together for this. The writer is not the killer. She wrote about it here. Unfortunately, when you reverted the anon, you restored the challenged content. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 10:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Deep fried okra, please send me the link. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Which? -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 10:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Deep fried okra, link to the content that I have restored. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Content you had restored. Since deleted. I just wanted to let you know 'cause I'm upset by the debacle described on my user talk page. This is a systemic problem. No one's fault really. The article creator retired over it and is blocked. He fought damn hard to keep that content. Cast all caution to the wind. He's a minor who drowned at the deep end. And now he's lost as a contributor. It's a systemic problem. I just wanted to bring it to the attention to the experienced editors who might have caught it but did not. Systemically, when we see page blanking of sourced material (and it was sourced, just wrongly), we restore w/o much thought. Or assume whitewashing. (I've had a bee in my bonnet over negative BLP since I received a threatening letter from an attorney for defaming his client by protecting content he does not like. Well, though I did not intentionally, or accidentally, or recklessly defame the subject, it has made me more careful.) Again, it's a systemic problem, and WP:HARM is a crock where it says, "doing no harm has been found to be incompatible with our obligation to maintain a neutral point of view when writing about all subjects, including living people." There's more mealy-mouthing, but that's the gist.  It condones and encourages inclusion of negative content. Removing defamatory content is an unmet obligation of the WMF and Wikipedia that is no one's problem. All we can do as individuals is carry our awareness and try to remove or not restore (or not protect)  challenged content. All I can do is hope to enlist others in doing so. Thanks,  -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 11:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Deep fried okra, I already understood you, but without link I unfortunately can't say anything about it. I do over 1000 edits every week and the page was already on 24.08.2020 deleted. So I can't remember what I changed. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Digital studio
I'm getting real tired of editors ignoring the actual edit summaries of IPs and slapping bs warnings after doing blind reverts. What you reverted is blatanly promotional and it is a word-for-word copy from the organizations it is promoting. Facebook pages? Twitter feeds? Honestly. 2605:A000:1327:6313:4DE1:63B7:A890:CA48 (talk) 15:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello 2605:A000:1327:6313:4DE1:63B7:A890:CA48, sorry for my revert, you're right. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Dammit will you actually LOOK AT WHAT YOU ARE REVERTING? Are you kidding me? 2605:A000:1327:6313:4DE1:63B7:A890:CA48 (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello 2605:A000:1327:6313:4DE1:63B7:A890:CA48, please use the comment line - thanks.Regards --Serols (talk) 16:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Review of Draft:Nikhil Anand
Dear Serols, there's a draft article of Nikhil Anand which I tried to create long back and have found it in the draft space. However, the language was advised to be changed and the needful has been done. Kindly have a look and if any minor change is required, kindly do the same. The reference links to the article also are from credible and big media sources. I will wait for your response. ThanksAayat1998 (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Aayat1998, see my answer on your talk page. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)