User talk:Serols/Archive 19

No Vandalism
Hello team Recently I made few minor changes in this wiki page : Võ Cạnh inscription, which is a Page Related to History. The previous Information on this page was incorrect. , So I corrected those Information. My corrections are Based on Proven historical facts and even few wiki pages have the similar info of my correction. But still my Edits are Removed and Said as Appeared to be Vandalism. I edited On behalf of A group of Researchers who worked on this field. So request The team to Help me out by solving this issue. Thank You.

194.223.55.166
Sockpuppet case about this vandal has been filed at Sockpuppet investigations/Johnny15678. Hopefully there will be an outcome that allows future sockpuppets to be dealt with more quickly. FDW777 (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Problem
believes you are my sockpuppet. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 11:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Chicdat, does that bother us? That does not bother me. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Perhaps he should be blocked. Also, please call me Chicdat, not 🐔. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me!  11:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Chicdat, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Perfect. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me!  11:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi am so sorry I didn't mean to its just my small brotheres i won't leave my phone with them omg i amm soo a shamed and u also deleted my draft i worked so hard on it plzz re considere i didn't sleep last night because I was traveling to get this information and you just simply delete them i want to talk to the manger rn rnrnrnnr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Host 9099087 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi
Can I know, how can I add a article on wikipedia Mir areiba ashraf (talk) 08:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Mir areiba ashraf, see here - How to create a page. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Please verify before over-reverting constructive edits
Regarding my edits in Ming Jie, please see Brent's Instagram, he referred his own surname as "Hsu" instead of "Xu". There is no mistake in doing so. Please verify before reverting. Thank you.--LuciferianThomas (talk) 08:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello LuciferianThomas, see your talk page. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

I just got a warning but just want to add info
just edited the page of lasina traore (nickname), but you removed it. His nickname is the coat rack from bobo-dioulasso, so i wanted to add this since it wasn't on wikipedia yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.165.156.30 (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Vladimir Leposavić
Hi Serols, edits such as at Vladimir Leposavić are very unlikely to be "vandalism" (malicious, with the intent to damage the encyclopedia), and even less likely to be "obvious vandalism" that qualifies for WP:ROLLBACKUSE without edit summary and with only a generic "vandalism" warning on the disagreeing user's page. As the onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content and WP:3RR exists, please reconsider your approach to such situations. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello ~ ToBeFree, I agree with you, please see here 1 and here. Have a nice day --Serols (talk) 13:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but... the same applies to you, doesn't it? ;) You too ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello ~ ToBeFree, please see the history. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 13:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I do see that others have reverted too; I was just concerned about the number of your reverts, and about Huggle's "vandalism" button having been used to make four of them. I just wanted to tell you that theoretically, this would have qualified for a WP:3RR block, and that it likely constituted a misuse of the rollback permission. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello ~ ToBeFree, for me it was vandalism (also for three other users), and vm would like to have several warnings. I also reported the article here - Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. The article and the user were then blocked. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:45, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Disruptive editing is not always vandalism, let alone "obvious vandalism". Concerns about libel are extremely unlikely to be vandalism. However, only obvious vandalism qualifies for summary-less rollback and more than three reverts. The page was protected because of disruption, not vandalism; the user was blocked for edit-warring, which you did too. I'm not sure why there's any disagreement about this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello ~ ToBeFree, don't understand the discussion either. The user does not respond to repeated requests to open the discussion page, one admin and 2 other users have also reverted the deletion, vm needs several warnings that I sent, user was blocked because edit warring, personal attacks, aspersions and you accuse me of edit war. I really don't understand, but the discussion is now finished for me and would not like to have any further explanations. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Insult
I suggest you to review this discussion. Maybe you can tell the same thing you told me to Aleenf1 if you look carefully (unless you're another one thinking that Wikipedia double standards are fine, so that hypocrite isn't an insult and peasant is instead). Anyway, I can't wait for one of you to find a source for SE Asia Champions League broadcasters: I will laugh at you so loudly until the moment. Because what Aleenf1 is doing is spreading misinformation. As I can see now Aleenf1 got some watchdogs also, maybe as a reward for his great contribution to this project, the free encyclopedia LOL --151.50.218.223 (talk) 12:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello 151.50.218.223, please discuss normally and not outrageously, thanks. --Serols (talk) 13:06, 9 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Already seen doing this by that bigot who goes under the name of Greg Burrell (ivanvector here on Wikipedia). When you cannot answer fairly, delete their answer. In some countries, it's called censorship: here on Wikipedia it's just "raising a constructive discussion". It's just the name that changes. Delete also this now :D GADOR --151.50.218.223 (talk) 15:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Do not try to whine about 'censorship' after showing poor conduct on Wikipedia. These are some of your statements:
 * "Ahahah you such a peasant."; "LOL Get help, asap."; "Greg Burrell (or ivanvector if you prefer) here is another evidence of how Wikipedia English is a lair of bigots and hypocrites"
 * Your edits are all personal attacks against other editors, including this very one I'm now responding to. That is simply disallowed on Wikipedia, and I think you know this. Do you honestly expect to be treated just the way you want on a website whose rules you wantonly break? Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 16:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)


 * AH! I've been defined an hypocrite at first and no one moved a finger to punish the guy who insulted me. I've been blocked for excessive trolling instead (let alone the fact the page was left not updated with wrong information displayed on it). Then the user who goes under the name of ivanvector told me to grow up when the user Aleenf1 was the one arguing like a little baby (but I guess that's okay if that's your policy about insults, isn't it?). Now, I've to hear that I'm getting paid back for what I did when I was actually arguing civilly with Aleenf1 and I've been offended first in this whole absurd story. No, this is not how coherence works mr. Tell. The one who broke the rules is still unpunished and his name is Aleenf1...I had tried only to discuss a matter the same guy didn't even want to hear about. This is outrageously senseless because it means that certain users can also offend other people on Wikipedia and get away with it, but if someone else tries to do the same ends up in this situation. DOUBLE STANDARDS.  --151.50.218.223 (talk) 17:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * And, please, have the courage to admit that saying hypocrite to someone else isn't an insult for you. Admit that some users can offend other people and stay unpunished. This farce is sickening. --151.50.218.223 (talk) 17:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

I will not accept this discussion on my page and have blanked it from the record.
He is a sex offender, whether he was found innocent on a technicality that the person who had the offense committed against them is now deceased and it cannot be confirmed or not... His name will forever be besmirched by the reality that he is a sex offender. Therefore your deletion is both unwaranted and blanked from my history. --120.22.0.52 (talk) 08:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * He was acquitted and is therefore considered innocent, whether that is fair or not. --Serols (talk) 08:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)


 * He is innocent in no ones books --120.22.0.52 (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, this is not relevant, the discussion is over. --Serols (talk) 08:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hello, I didn't try to vandalism anything. its true. im from the city and it causing problems. the reason for this article isnt even true. the entire foundation met only once or twice. Why is there all this for only one meeting that never came about after. There are 20 people listed and non of them did anything except show up for one meeting. The first article is race baiting and caused a problem at work. Its fake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oijdgoijg30jg (talk • contribs) 19:06, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * There is now a discussion at Talk:Bring_New_Orleans_Back_Commission, and I have interpreted the comment as a proposal for deletion (WP:PROD). Since you have restored the content twice, perhaps you'd like to join the discussion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Byzantine Empire
Hi Serols,

Happy Christmas!

Apologies for the inconvenience but my edits to the “Byzantine Empire” and “Byzantine” page were not vandalism. I simply intended to give greater prominence to the title “The Eastern Roman Empire” as this is academically a more accurate term. “Byzantine” and the “Byzantine Empire” were terms created by enlightenment era historians seeking to make out that the empire was a decadent and super religious failed state in order to critique the Christian Church in their own times by showing how bad religion is. This is even discussed in the article I edited!

I have not removed the terms Byzantine Empire and Byzantium. I have simply given more prominence to the more accurate title.

Romanland: Ethnicity and Empire in Byzantium by Anthony Kaldellis (Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England, 2019) or Byzantium: Unbound also by Anthony Kaldellis (Leeds, 2019) are both good sources for this if you need one.

I would be very grateful if you would consider keeping some of my amendments.

Apologies again for the inconvenience. I should have explained this in the edit summary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4B00:8635:8B00:8984:74BB:FB15:ED8B (talk) 13:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello 2A01:4B00:8635:8B00:8984:74BB:FB15:ED8B, please note the article name. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho


Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.

Yo Ho Ho


Denisarona (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.

Fructuosus
New to Wikipedia... Thanks for helping to teach me the rules of the road. I hope this is an ok place to ask for my published journal article on the Martyrdom of Fructuosus to be considered for the citations and bibliography this Wikipedia article. I've made a point of archiving it open access for the sake of transparency.

“Christendom Witnesses to the Martyrs: Modulations of the Acta Martyrum in Prudentius’ Peristephanon vi.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 63.2 (April 2012) 219–35. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3756202 doi.org/10.1017/S0022046911002612

Thanks! Vocesanticae (talk) 19:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Serols!


Happy New Year! Serols, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Beef and Dairy podcast edit
Hi, thanks for your message. I don't really understand why you found it unconstructive to add an external link to one of the podcast's actors - can you explain? I think there should probably be a link to the homepage of the podcast itself too, which I am happy to add. Shel Valentine (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Shel Valentine, please note Weblinks. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the guidance, hopefully I've got it right second time round.Shel Valentine (talk) 17:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Re: January 2021
I literally fixed a typo, and you reverted it to the erroneous spelling. 104.246.216.49 (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This was ok?. --Serols (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Warned IP keeps coming back
Hi,

Are you admin? The IP warned by you and by me, keeps coming back. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:85.186.200.81 He also holds this user. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Skandura

And keeps vandalising this page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FCSB&action=history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F09:3A17:BD00:CDB7:7E42:C947:340E (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Are you real
You've been given a lot of honors and made lots of edits. But your user page has been deleted over and over again. Are you a real editor or a bot? Gale Peterson (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Gale Peterson, why should you be a bot if you don't have a user page? --Serols (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't know just curious. I guess you're real, then. Gale Peterson (talk) 17:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * We try not to give praise to our bots, it just makes them more likely to rise up and overthrow us. Kuru   (talk)  02:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry
I thought I was on my own page for a sec, thx for reverting it — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigBrainBoi1 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)