User talk:Serols/Archive 24

This is why I will never donate to Wikipedia and discourage everyone from doing that
I rolled back your change at the page because is was not constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.123.150.27 (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello. sorry, but If you make it again, you get the next warning. --Serols (talk) 15:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Hunterston Brooch
Hi Serols. I'm going to change the article back to my version. It was vandalised by user:Aquacraze777 on the 25th of August, and I was just repairing the refname to fix the cite error. Please see Help:Cite errors/Cite error references no text for details. Thanks 89.241.33.89 (talk) 15:43, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello 89.241.33.89, thank you for the information. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, hope you are doing well. I believe you didn't checked what was removed because we(different users) are working on the page to fix the tone that promotes the subject and I removed all the promotional and unreferenced material from the page Guadalupe Hayes-Mota. If I did anything wrong, please do let me know thank you. JK.Kite (talk) 19:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello JK.Kite, the answer is on your talk page. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok, but should I clean the tone right? I did last time but a user reverted saying there's still tone issue that I cleaned. What are these links??? JK.Kite (talk) 19:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello JK.Kite, do not quite understand what you mean. You have deleted the info box with your editing, therefore my comment on your talk page and revert. The links belong to another post. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Incorrect reversal of my contribution.
Your reversal of the change I made ("one of the worst films ever made") is incorrect. The movie is currently on the Wikipedia list of worst films ever made, and I was revising the entry (which incorrectly stated "one of the best films ever made") to correct suspected vandalism.

Please restore the change I made. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4450:8182:E500:EDE2:F6DE:7746:FC43 (talk) 11:10, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello 2001:4450:8182:E500:EDE2:F6DE:7746:FC43, sorry for my revert, your edit was ok - see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Venedykt Aleksiychuk
Even though official Church communications will often transliterate the bishop's name from Ukrainian (i.e. "Venedykt"),his eparchy's offical style is to translate his name into English (i.e. "Benedict"), he also self-signs official documents with the "Benedict" nomenclature. I think the Wiki should reflect his personal style and his eparchy's style. julianhayda (talk) 4 August July 2021


 * Hello julianhayda, please note Article_titles, thanks. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

hello i'm 
thanks for you help and i hope many should procces more with guide on via any desk. MrDDBOI (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Incorrect reverasal of my contribution.
Dear Serols, your reversal was incorrect. I changed the name Mtwara Rural to Mtwara District as per 2012 Census by the National Bereau of Statistics.

recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mtwara Rural

please restore the change I made, thanks. Khalidsalewa (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Khalidsalewa, please note aticle title and Article_titles. Important is also to use sources. I will not take the change back. I hope you did not make these changes anymore. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Serols. So The user 97.101.193.162 has Vandalised assault rifle list, attacks your talk page and false accused me.
So The user 97.101.193.162 has attacked and made a lot of vandalism, and used false accuse against me, and attacked your talk page. He said Freak Off although swearing can be hashtagged. 97.101.193.162 has swear using bad words, so thanks for saving your talk page. So I removed the edit from 97.101.193.162 because he broke rules like false accuse & vanalism. Serol, You saved the day. You’re a hero in Wikipedia. Actually 97.101.193.162 got blocked from 2 months. Well that’s true. I’m sure about it. You’re destroying vandalism. If You sign my comment, then thank you for signing it. I’m here to trust you. By: User 101.127.139.158


 * Hello 101.127.139.158, thank you for the information and your friendly words. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

You’re Welcome Serols :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.127.139.158 (talk) 01:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Looks Like 97.101.193.162 is deleting blocks for no reason so he got blocked for 3 months. His block timing increased for removing a block for no reasons. Sign my comment so I can eventually be helping you. Big update at the date:17 October 2021. By:2406:3003:2002:57:11da:1ced:a437:57a2

Hello, this is user 97.101.193.162. I'm contacting you to report user 101.127.139.158 and his alternate IP 2406:3003:2002:57:11DA:1CED:A437:57A2. This user has spent the last 24 hours harassing me and claims to have the power to "Block" me for disruptive editing. I have already reported him to the Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism page, yet he continues to harass me. Can you do anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.101.193.162 (talk) 11:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Spelling
Hi so I see that you removed my edit to the skara Wikipedia page and I see you are talking about my spelling can you tell me what I spelled wrong and what was bad about my grammar and give me advice to improve Wikilover126 (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Wikilover126, please use upper and lower case. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok I will try to improve that Wikilover126 (talk) 14:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok done is it now good?

P.S. I added citation’s in case if that might be needed Wikilover126 (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Wikilover126, its ok now. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Shakespeare's influence
Hey Serols,

Regarding your message on my talk page and the edit I made to Shakespeare's influence, I did put my reasoning for removing the infobox in the edit summary (specifically that 1] other similar articles such as Religious views of William Shakespeare and Reputation of William Shakespeare do not contain an person infobox as they are not biography articles and 2] that the main article's infobox and this articles box are different and will continue to drift out of sync with one another).

Do you think that my edit summary was too brief or that I should have brought it up on the talk page first (I couldn't see any discussion there on this and don't think there was a particular consensus around keeping it) Cakelot1 (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Cakelot1, please do not delete the infobox, the box contains important information. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The issue is that this information in the infobox is an almost duplicate of the infobox on the main page (compare William Shakespeare with Shakespeare's influence). It dosn't seem usful to have a duplicated slightly incorrect biographical infobox on a non-biographical page. I'll probably bring it up on the talk page to see what others think of removing it. Cakelot1 (talk) 13:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Edmund Nagle
Hi, thanks for rollbacking the additions to Edmund Nagle while I sat there staring at the page wondering what I should do. Thought I'd note that while you labelled it as unsourced content it was also a straight rip of this website. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Pickersgill-Cunliffe, with specification of the source, the editing would be ok. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Please read pages before editing them
You evidently did not read the page before making this edit. You have failed to reach your intended audience.

Have a day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.228.78.75 (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello 207.228.78.75, more edits like this] you risk to block. --Serols (talk) 15:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * You reverted criticism of your actions here, so 47 of your edits have been reverted. Keep fighting against anonymous IP addresses, and stay irrelevant! 207.228.78.5 (talk) 13:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

I already solved the problem of "Spanish-Catalan"
Hello Serols:

I am writing you this message to tell you that I re-edited the articles of Catalan politicians and I was successful. This time I used the consensus formula: "Spanish politician from Catalonia" and nobody reversed my edits.

Personally, I think that the other users who edited those articles and who insisted that only the term "Catalan" be used is because those users are in favor of the Catalan independence ideology. And I think it is very likely that those users know the consensus but prefer to ignore it.

I think that Wikipedia content should be neutral and not influenced by the political ideology of the users. I think that the consensus formula is quite neutral.

Here I send you the link to one of my editions so that you can see the explanation that I used in the edition summary:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1047293241

Greetings Aziyade Gil (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Aziyade Gil, thanks for the information. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

About The Ice Cream Man page
I apologize if I messed up your work on it. I was only trying to add the cover image. I'm new to Wikipedia editing and would like to fix the issues I caused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halyna11 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

About The Ice Cream Man page pt2
I would like to help fix it, as long as there's a way to add the cover image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halyna11 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Halyna11, the cover image does not exist, otherwise I would have inserted it. If you work something, please use the button Show changes, before you publish the editing. Please ask me, if you need help. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 15:16, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello ~ ToBeFree, thank you for informing me. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

RFPP Decline and Query
Hi Serols,

I just declined your RFPP request about Quranism. I obviously first looked at the most recent set of large removals by an IP, and I was wondering why you a) reverted them stating unexplained content removal when they had edit summaries and b) reported it as vandalism.

I also checked back a few days further, and while there are clearly content disagreements, I couldn't spot clearcut vandalism, please feel free to point out if incorrect Nosebagbear (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Nosebagbear, thank you for informing me. If it is ok for you, it's that for me too. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Eddy de Jongh page
Please note that all the recent changes made to the page 'Eddy de Jongh' have been made by Eddy de Jongh himself. These changes are all but unconstructive as they correct a number of mistakes and provide more information. Moreover, I've included a selected bibliography. 'Book chapters should actually read 'articles', as that is what they are first and foremost. Please do not bar me from editing my own page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C02:2F23:EE00:F8CB:6810:7BD3:586D (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello 2001:1C02:2F23:EE00:F8CB:6810:7BD3:586D, please use sources. --Serols (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

I left all sources intact in the 'career' section, bar one, which accompanied a sentence that made little sense.

As for the bibliography, every single entry there is a source in and of itself, so how can the use of sources be a problem of the editing I did (which consisted mostly of correcting a number of details)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A45F:869A:1:45CF:5948:4757:4946 (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

In actual fact, you were so quick to undo changes made, you cannot possibly have come to the substantiated conclusion this page was being violated. You probably even failed to see that the final adjustments were made to parts of the page I myself had uploaded only a few hours earlier.

For your information, this page was created by Crispulop (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crispulop), who even states the following on his page: Since 2015 I started writing pages on first the Spinoza Prize winners and subsequently members Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). As of early I have created over 100 articles. I am not even really interested in academics, I think I just liked that the notability of KNAW members is very clear per Wikipedia:Notability (academics). So if you feel you can improve on those articles, please do! --2A02:A45F:869A:1:11DA:C3BD:FA6F:AF22 (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, such edits do not make sense at Wikipedia.en. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

2.97.230.9
Hi Serols. I'm confused. This IP made an unconstructive edit at 14:10 UTC and you gave the IP a uw-vandal3 at 14:11 UTC, but then reported them to AIV a minute later despite the IP having made no further edits. It's not the first time I've seen you do this but I'm often on my phone. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 14:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello HJ Mitchell, the last vandalism edit was 14:45 UTC, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * But you miss my point. They made that edit as I was typing (and I've now blocked the IP), and after you reported them to AIV. At the time you made the AIV report, they hadn't edited since the warning you gave them. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 15:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello HJ Mitchell, please see the edit history, the IP has made vandalism edits in three hours, there would have been more, what happened. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm familiar with their edit history. What I don't understand is why you warned them, and then reported them to AIV before they made another edit. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 16:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello HJ Mitchell, I do not understand your problem. The IP had three warnings after three vandalism edits 1 2 3 in two hours, two of them from me, so I reported that. After that came the fourth 4. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The problem is that you gave the third warning for the third edit (fine), but then reported them to AIV a minute later before they made any other edits. I don't understand why you would escalate to AIV before the IP edits again.
 * Hello <b style="color: teal; font-family: Tahoma">HJ Mitchell</b>, please sign your comments.
 * Take a look at it from another side: If the IP had been blocked after the third warning, would not have given the fourth vandalism edit anymore. I think in Wikipedia there is enough vandalism, since you would not have been needed. The discussion is finished for me. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

vandalism
jesus christ, stop reverting vandalism so fast, I can't keep up! Every time I go to revert something, you've already done it. 9yz (talk) 18:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello 9yz, I'm doing it slower now. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Okay I understand Can u help me on creating a Bio !!
I agree Princejoel44 (talk) 20:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Princejoel44, see here -> How to create a page. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

A Barnstar (or maybe 2) for you!
You deserve to be an admin so you get TWO admin barnstars! (how fitting!) Lopbunny69 (talk) 17:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)