User talk:Serols/Archive 25

Yaqub-Har
- maybe a bit harsh but there is no way they can edit that article sensibly at the moment. I couldn't think of a better word than "gibberish". Doug Weller talk 12:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Doug Weller, you have made the best. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 13:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Ryan Clark Regarding Pacific White-Sided Dolphins Article
I made a change to the article on Pacific White-Sided Dolphins. The citation with the scientific name is NOAA Fisheries or https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/pacific-white-sided-dolphin

Ryan2021 (talk) 01:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Ryan2021, this source is perfect. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Please see
...recent edit summary, for my reversion. The link is dangerous as it stands. Better to have no link than an unsafe one. If you want, take the time to find a working link! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:C700:558:EDC1:CD9B:658C:A37C (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Please provide a link. Minkai ( rawr! )(see where I screwed up) 16:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello 2601:246:C700:558:EDC1:CD9B:658C:A37C, your edit was ok. sorry for my revert. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

I’m sorry
I apologise for apparently vandalising the page. I’ve only just read your messages now and I’ve now realised what i’ve done. I just wanted to let you know that I’m sorry

Mr Fredericks 2A02:C7F:5027:4300:2026:D375:98AA:AC95 (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, please stop with your vandalism. --Serols (talk) 16:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Hungarian Soviet Republic
The user used sources from communist era writers. He also made fantastic claims, which are not supported by the sources. He elevated/highlighted sentences from the original context of his source, where it is enough to read and see the full context/ pages of his source which prove that his sentences are not represent the reality. --Kandallok (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

The most stupid and misleading sentences can be found in the lead of the article.

For example, the war with Czechoslovakia and the establishment of Slovak Soviet Republic is a caesura in the chain of events. He stated that Czech Serbo-French and Romanian armies occupied territories because they fought aganst communism. False. Béla kun and his comrades were POWs in Russia, when Serbo-French Romanian and Czech forces started to occupy the territories of the liberal/capitalist First Hungarian Republic led by Count Mihály Károlyi. So the capitalist/Liberal Hungary lost around 75 % of its territory before the communist coup attempt and creation of Svoiet Republic. So the territorial occupation of neighbouring countries did not start as a war against communism, but simply for for territorial gain/occupation against the capitalist First Hungarian Republic.

He also stated that military officers supported the war. However they left the Red army (with their leader Aurel Stromfeld ) after the establishment of Slovak Soviet Republic. He also stated that everybody supported the communists, which is false, because the Communists government had no authority in the countriside, where the communist waged war against the people of the countryside, the so-called Red Terror (Hungary).He also failed to mention of the original name of the Republic, which is lost in the mistranslation.

--Kandallok (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

UK's education section
Howdy. Why deny Scotland a sub-section heading, when England, Wales & Northern Ireland have one? GoodDay (talk) 14:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello GoodDay, your edit was a double, see here -> Main|Education in Scotland and Scotland. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The other three are doubles, too. GoodDay (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello GoodDay, then try it again - as a heading. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Minoan language editor
I've deleted ":������[Kiritja Juia]" and reverted back to the original dates. I've no idea what the first means, and I can't source 3000 BC. Doug Weller  talk 16:43, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Posted to my talk page with their IP address claiming that's its real name. Doug Weller  talk 16:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

I don't want anything from you!
I am not looking for money, I am just looking for justice and for the real informations about my ancestors! 79.117.44.113 (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Spanish name
Because I was founding the Spanish name of his birthname Luis Felipe Calderón Blet. He was a Head Coach for Team Cuba in the Women's Volleyball in the year 2000. And he was a Volleyball player for men in 1972 in Munich. I was looking for translations in Spanish. I was checking his full name at: m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11764142 72.69.243.12 (talk) 20:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello 72.69.243.12, please note Article_titles. Regards --Serols (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Serols
Thank you for your trying to make me know how to make changes legally! My informations aren't erronate and I can prove it ,if I must tell you from where I've taked this I'll tell you! 79.117.44.113 (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * No idea what you want from me. --Serols (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * This is User:Minos Zakaria 12, the Minoan language editor. Doug Weller  talk 16:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Doug Weller, thanks for the information, now I know what the IP thought. Hope he will soon stop with the nonsense. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Both IP and account have been blocked. He was insistent that he knew the name of the language of his ancestors. A bit like the guy I blocked who knew for sure he was a direct descendant of Jesus, he had the same DNA! Doug Weller  talk 19:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Doug Weller, do not understand why so many are resistant to warnings. The user really had many chances. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Random question, but whats going on with your user page?
Just have never seen one like yours before. Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 16:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Th78blue, that was vandalism, so I can only edit the page. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Your user page was vandalized? You can't revert it to whatever you want? Its YOUR user page! *shocked looking smiley face* Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 17:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Th78blue, no, vandalism edits by new users and IPs. I asked an admin, to locked the site for all. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Thanks. I didn't know you could do that. Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 17:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Reverting edits
Hello. This is in response to edits reverted on the Cytokinetics article. I am working on this page to remove content in response to the template. The information about ongoing studies and trials does not fit with the Wikipedia content policies and sourcing WP:MEDRS. I will post this on your talk page as well and plan to continue to edit the page unless you have other suggestions. Thanks! FksUkvpG (talk) 16:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello FksUkvpG, ok, but use please the comment line. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision rollback
I made an edit on the page Starfire and the edit was removed. It was similar to other listings on the Starfire page and I am not sure why it was removed 64.20.68.19 (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello 64.20.68.19, the school has nothing to do with the word Starfire. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

African elephant
Hey Serols : thanks for checking this page!! I'm sure you noticed the many reverts by the now indefinitely blocked User:Reusensio. I wouldn't be surprised if this new editor is another sockpuppet of the same guy? – BhagyaMani (talk) 16:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello BhagyaMani, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 👍 – BhagyaMani (talk) 16:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

removal of link because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia.
why is letting people know about the latest web applications seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia on web application article ... I don't understand the removal of my link what was inappropriate? the blog is relevant to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikientry99 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Read Wikipedia's policy re WP:BLOGS. – BhagyaMani (talk) 08:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello BhagyaMani, thank you for answering for me. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Eleni Gabre-Madhin page
Hello Serols, please understand all recent changes made to the Eleni Gabre-Madhin Page were made by Eleni Gabre-Madin herself. The last paragraph in her career section was added in the previous few days and is defamatory and vandalistic in nature, it is also based on unproven and alleged claims and against an accomplished entrepreneur/celebrity. The content itself does not pertain to her actual career but is a recent outburst and scapegoating from what is a tense and divided political climate in Ethiopia. Specific details within the paragraph are inaccurate, such as "The meeting was intended to topple Abiy's government and masterminding transitional government," which was disproven by meeting organizers in a statement. Other statements are unrelated and vilifying such as the searching of her house, which is common practice in Ethiopia in the current political landscape, being linked to the video meeting.

Keeping this content on the page demonstrates a clear bias towards a particular political view in Ethiopia which is highly divisive and damaging, nor does it fall under Wikipedia's guidelines of presenting neutral and unbiased information. Similar unproven information spread on other platforms has led to death threats, sexism, and harassment towards Eleni Gabre-Madhin and her family. Kindly remove this paragraph and allow Eleni Gabre-Madhin to edit her own page.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C02:2F23:EE00:F8CB:6810:7BD3:586D (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello 2001:1C02:2F23:EE00:F8CB:6810:7BD3:586D, edits without sources will be deleted, Likewise, unfounded deletions are restored (with sources). If the text sections are not correct, she should use the discussion page. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Reversion
I don't understand Why do you call it greco buddhist art And gandharan art The article seems to be a victim of eurocentrism Indian art is not derived from Greece Please stop this bias.. IRONCULT117 (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello IRONCULT117, this is unsourced and the wrong place and her you deleted Greco-Buddhist art, this is the article name. Please underclass such changes --Serols (talk) 12:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

why is your user page deleted and protected
just wanna know Lopbunny69 (talk) 16:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Lopbunny69, see here. --Serols (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * But did you ever want a user page? – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs)  08:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello AssumeGoodWraith, I do not need an user page. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:46, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Persistent vandalism: vandals created the page too many times and so admins had to delete it and create-protect it—see the edit filter log and log for that page. Ethan  Gaming  7640  16:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for telling me! As a reward I present you this!

Vandal "Panorama.PL"
Sorry, I'm not experimenting here. It would be nice if you followed the real vandal. I inform you that user "Panorama.PL" and his sockpuppets is a particularly harmful and poisonous troll / vandal. All of his contributions are vandalism. Please see here 2A01:C23:90F5:8700:7893:FFD0:BDD:B241 (talk) 19:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello 2A01:C23:90F5:8700:7893:FFD0:BDD:B241, sorry, but your edit was not ok, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

08.12.2021
I'm sorry, I mistakenly canceled your edit - I moved it back already.31.40.131.100 (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello 31.40.131.100, it can happen. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Accidentally reverted edit for BLP issues
Hey! Just figured I let you know but, while attempting to thank you for reverting an edit I accidentally clicked the RW button to revert an edit for BLP issues since it appeared right as I was hitting the thank button. I've since undone that edit with an edit summary explaining it was an accident. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Blaze The Wolf, no problem, I have already happened to me. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion 2


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Serols. Are you really not going to respond to the 3RR complaint? EdJohnston (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello EdJohnston, in my opinion, it was about a second opinion and that was communicated. The fact is that I have read this editing and accepted it. For me, this edit was the only one, that complied with the rules. Should I add that? I still believe that I did the right thing. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Serols, are you willing to explain at Talk:LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates the reasons for your reverts? What changes are you calling unsourced? (You made this revert on grounds of lack of source). I didn't notice either you or the IPv6 adding or removing any source, so possibly you are referring to some source that might be already in the article. EdJohnston (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello EdJohnston, the missing source message referred to because they were cross-dressing. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * You removed 'cross-dressing' but left in place that the Singaporeans' conviction was 'for attempting to resemble women'? Do you see a difference? EdJohnston (talk) 18:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello EdJohnston, in this case I have to agree with you now, I overlooked that. Now my online time is over. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The discussion has been closed amicably and with semi-protection. Sorry for mostly talking about you instead of with you there; I was pretty frustrated. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello ~ ToBeFree, I've been active at Wikipedia for many years and think that in this time I will have contributed a lot to maintain the quality. During this time I also got to know many other users and IPs, including you, which are as well take care of Wikipedia very actively, each in his own way. I therefore regard these users and the IPs as colleagues, some as friends, and not as anonymous people.
 * Did I make mistakes during this time? Of course, after all, I'm not a robot and I think so No one is free from faults.
 * Let's take your example
 * The IP rightly removed sections as they did not contain any sources. Unfortunately, I didn't notice that until late, exactly after four reverts. Then I saved the article in my browser immediately under favorites and then apologized to the IP talk page. The aim was to enable the IP to be changed again or to undo my editing. I did everything to correct my mistake. Nevertheless, you reported me on the site, which I honestly found not very collegial.
 * You mention here a discussion with me on my talk page last year.
 * In the article mentioned, a user knowingly removed a critical section indicating the source. I don't think I am a wall. We both just had a different opinion on whether the editing was vandalism/disruptive. For me it was vandalism at the time, as the user tried to remove critical reporting. The user was then also blocked because of edit warring, personal attacks, and aspersions.
 * Since other users were also of my opinion, I do not find it appropriate to list this as another example for edit on my part.
 * Please do not see this as a criticism of yourself, I just want to state my point of view.
 * You write above Sorry for talking mostly about you instead of with you there; I was pretty frustrated.
 * Why were you frustrated? If you really wanted to talk to me, why not on my talk page? You are always welcome here. Wish you a nice week. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello EdJohnston, thank you very much for your help, your efforts and your time that you have invested for me. Wish you a nice week. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)