User talk:Serteqrgewg

September 2021
Hello, I'm 0Michael105. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chris Broderick without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   &mdash; 0Michael105  (talk · contribs) 22:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Chris Broderick, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 22:53, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
FMSky (talk) 03:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, Serteqrgewg, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)