User talk:Sertnwoe5s

Welcome!

Hello, Sertnwoe5s, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Atheism and bestiality, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joel Why? talk  16:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Atheism and bestiality


Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joel Why? talk  16:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Atheism and obesity


The article Atheism and obesity has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Rambling essay that gives undue weight to the author's point of view.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Atheism and bestiality
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please [ click here].

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Atheism and obesity


Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joel Why? talk  16:45, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Neutrality
Clearly, you have an opinion that atheism is inherently immoral. That's fine - you're entitled to your opinion. But Wikipedia insists that articles be written from a neutral point of view, and your editing has failed to show that. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for you to spread your opinions. If that is what you wish, you are free to start your own blog somewhere and exercise your freedom of speech to your heart's content. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:45, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Are you an atheist?

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

UNBLOCK ME
this is a violation of the First Amendment
 * Actually it's not, this is a private website. The First Amendment protects people from government action.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Even if the First Amendment applied to Wikipedia, which it doesn't, I'm pretty sure it does not permit you to violate Conservapedia's copyright by pasting its content onto Wikipedia repeatedly, which is what you've been doing. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * See WP:FREESPEECH. JohnCD (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Conservapedia is truth. I am spreading it.