User talk:Seruvim

May 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at CECO Environmental, you may be blocked from editing. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 20:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * This was not vandalism. It was truth about this company, company policy, and how this companies employees feel. It was a valid edit and i can provide image proof this is all truth and valid.
 * Id be happy to provide evidence to prove that this is in fact truth. Seruvim (talk) 20:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Where is your evidence? Please take a look at Reliable sources in order to understand what counts as an appropriate source you can use to support the allegations. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 20:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/15PoOV_tzxoiLCS301ATWM_LPxpvgUn6L?usp=sharing
 * I attempted to add images to the article but it would not allow it. Seruvim (talk) 20:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I took a look at the folder, and all it contains are Facebook posts and a profile. Facebook is not a reliable source because it is a self-published source. I do not see anything that connects with alleged allegations of abuse at CECO Environmental. Do you have any serious, hard evidence? I suggest looking at Verifiability, not truth and Truth requires sources. Continuing to add unsourced negative information about a subject is defamatory, and if you continue, you may be blocked from editing. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 21:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * its about a director of this company condoning and promoting violence against women and when brought to the attention of the companies HR team they just covered it up. As per my edit of this article I called this behavior out. The images are direct proof that a director is promoting this. Seruvim (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the clarification. Did you read the essays and guideline I linked? I also think you should read Verifiability and No original research, both policies. I'm pinging as she reverted an edit to the article making the same allegation. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 21:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, I agree with what LPS and MLP Fan said. Unsourced and negative information about people and companies can be seen as vandalism, and I do not see how your "evidence" supports anything you've edited about. EDM fan 2 (talk) 21:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes i did. Seeing as it is verifiable. The screen capture clearly shows not only the user, but his position in the company, and the posts he very clearly posted. This makes it verifiable. Not opinion as i am not providing an opinion on what was said only the fact that it was said. Not hearsay as this is not a quote but his original content. Seruvim (talk) 21:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)