User talk:SetItStr8

April 2023
Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Jon Schaffer, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! 331dot (talk) 05:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jon Schaffer. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * He was convicted for his role in trying to overthrow U.S. democracy. The President of the United States declared this an act of domestic terrorism. My opinion DOD not enter into my accurate edit of this terrorist and coward’s Wikipedia page. SetItStr8 (talk) 05:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * "Coward" is a non-starter. In terms of "terrorist" you will need to have independent reliable sources that use that term to describe him. There is no specific crime of "terrorism"- which is not what Mr. Schaffer was convicted of. 331dot (talk) 05:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi SetItStr8! The term "terrorist" is considered a "contentious label" per the Wikipedia Manual of Style policy (please see MOS:LABEL). That policy states: "Value-laden labels – such as calling ... an individual a ... terrorist ... may express contentious opinion and are best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject, in which case use in-text attribution." Your edit did not demonstrate that this label was "widely used by reliable sources". You also referred to the subject as a "coward," which is generally an opinion. Wikipedialuva (talk) 06:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Jon Schaffer, you may be blocked from editing. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 05:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 06:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.