User talk:Setthingsright42

November 2023
Please don't change any other editor's post to a talk page so as to make it appear that they wrote something which they did not in fact write. JBW (talk) 11:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Mika Tosca. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 19:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:Mika Tosca while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi Setthingsright42! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Well apparently “Haopy editing” is not an option, because I have been blocked from doing so by someone who doesn’t like the fact that I want to ensure that a highly relevant incident is covered at all in Mika Tosca’s web page… Setthingsright42 (talk) 19:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Hi, your recent talk page contributions seem to be incompatible with the "500 edits" restriction mentioned in the blue box above. See WP:A/I/PIA and WP:ARBECR for details. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I apologize for the method of edits of my own entry. I apologize for not having been logged in when I made one (or more?) of my edits. That was not my intention.
 * re good faith, do not tell me what I may or may not have assumed, as you cannot read my mind. I have, however, repeatedly pointed out that WHATEVER the intentions of those involved in not allowing any posting on the incident in question to be on the page, the RESULT of these actions is antiSemitic censorship. THAT is the issue here. And each day that goes by with ZERO mention of this incident on the page is yet another day of antisemitic censorship, again regardless of the intentions of those responsible for the indefensible censorship. Setthingsright42 (talk) 10:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You are very close to, at best, a topic ban, and at worse a WP:NOTHERE block. 331dot (talk) 10:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * And apparently I was blocked almost immediately after, or perhaps before, your note.
 * what other recourse do I have to get an obvious well sourced true incident to be mentioned on a web page, given that administrators are clearly doing ongoing censorship of the page by not merely objecting to the exact wording someone might use to describe the incident, but preventing ANY mention of the incident to be on the page at all? Setthingsright42 (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * It's not just administrators, it's editors; administrators are not the arbiters of content. No one is engaging in censorship- curation of content according to our policies is not censorship.  Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or a place to list all the misdeeds a person allegedly engages in. 331dot (talk) 20:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I did, upon further consideration and investigation after my message, decide that a block was necessary to prevent further disruption. The reviewing admin is free to take that into account during their review. 331dot (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * It seems you were blocked for continuing to edit in the same way after 's message and the others above. It seems reasonable to assume that you didn't see 331dot's message before publishing the latest comment at Talk:Mika Tosca, but I don't think another warning was necessary before placing a block.
 * The WP:A/I/PIA / WP:ARBECR / "500 edits" restriction generally also applies to this page here. The block, the behavior that led to it, and the blocking action, can of course be discussed here (WP:BANEXEMPT). Simply continuing the discussion from Talk:Mika Tosca, for example by purely stating your opinion about what the article should say and why not doing so is censorship in your view, is problematic though. You are blocked from editing, you are practically currently banned from the topic "Arab-Israeli conflict" because you don't meet the 500 edits requirement, and your unblock request should explain which legitimate editing you'd like to perform if unblocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Unblock request
Syntax fixed, heading replaced ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)