User talk:Seu Deva

December 2015
Hello, I'm Eteethan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Action of August 1702— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Ete ethan  (talk) &#127876; 21:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

I have reverted more than one of your recent contributions. I am concerned that you tend to employ a unilateral approach, sometimes in direct defiance of earlier Talk Page discussions, when in many cases the more apropriate course is to invite previous contributors to revise or support their edits. The removal of text with a newly-applied "citation needed" tag in Opium Wars was a particularly aggressive example. David Trochos (talk) 00:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * So the guy deleted part of the article to insert some unsourced nonsense and he is right and I'm wrong. Hope you notified the other guy which reverted this too.
 * BTW, you're saying that I was editing Fir Bolg unilaterally but you're doing the same at Opium Wars. I think you're just pissed with me and reverting without any rationale. Is there any place where I can complain about this?


 * Take a close look at the sentence you have inserted to replace the unsourced claim in Opium Wars. The first of at least three questions you should ask yourself is- Does it tell us anything about the subject we would not know if it was omitted? David Trochos (talk) 22:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)