User talk:Seusse

Welcome!
Hello, Seusse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Bilby (talk) 10:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

2005 Cronulla riots
Hi! The problem is that we can't create a background section without a source that links what we're adding to the article. If there is a source that discusses the 2002 rapes in direct relation to the 2005 riots, we can have a section. But without a source making the connection, any attempt that we might make to put the two together runs afoul of the policy on synthesis. Hopefully there is a source that discusses the Cronula riots and the 2002 rapes, but without that source we're stuck. - Bilby (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That's still not what we are looking for - it doesn't connect the two events, except in the concept of "lebs" which isn't what you then go on and present. There should be a source somewhere discussing the two, so I'll look when I can. In the meantime we can't use the content without a string source claiming that the 2002 rapes were one of the factors that led to the 2005 riots, and it needs to be strong enough to warrant the level of focus that you wish to add. - Bilby (talk) 11:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, ok, so potentially, we could tie in the concept of 'lebs' with the rapes? As the rapes being a contributor to the infamous 'leb' image? correct? Or is that going a step too far? Seusse (talk) 11:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, You have made zero attempt to insert the information with a source. I am starting to believe that you may be attempting to censor my information or ignore it. Is this assumption correct, or can you present efforts to show otherwise? As of current, even with the sources I provided in accommodation with your requirements; you have turned them down as they are in your words 'not what we are looking for'. Whoever determines what 'we' are looking for, should realise that ultimately it falls under the authority of the website itself; their codes and requirements, not that of a single person. I say this not to be personal, but to be quite literal and straightforward. I would like to see the information represented, not repressed. Seusse (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)