User talk:Sevenapart

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sevenapart/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  18:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Vecteezy) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Vecteezy, Sevenapart!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"an article like this needs references, if no reliable references can be found, it dowes not belong on wikipedia"

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

InsertCleverPhraseHere  22:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shawn Rubel


A tag has been placed on Shawn Rubel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 23:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * In response to the message you'd left on the article's talk page: I'm afraid your remarks pretty much explained why Rubel's story doesn't rise to the level of significance necessary to avoid speedy deletion, or the standard of notability that an article's topic has to meet to avoid deletion altogether. Being known on the local scene isn't generally adequate for inclusion. See the general notability guidelines and the guidelines for people. Largoplazo (talk) 23:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Affirm (company)


A tag has been placed on Affirm (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jytdog (talk) 18:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bowling Green, Kentucky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Adopt me