User talk:Sevendust62

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~ ; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Deb 22:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thank you
And thank-you for inspiring the researching and reorganization of Tikkun Olam by your additions of Rav Hirsch and Rav Kook! I look forward to your future contributions on that article and others. Kol tuv, Egfrank 17:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Moshe Shmuel Glasner
Hi. Thought I'd ask you about the connection betw Rabbis Glasner and Berkovits here, if that's ok with you. If not, I apologize and am glad to pick it up on the article Talk page. Anyway, the article text goes: "extremely similar to that of Rabbi Eliezer Berkovits." The footnote says: "An examination of Rabbi Berkovits's works leads to the unmistakable conclusion...." I'm wondering who made this examination and drew this conclusion. If it's you (i.e., Wikipedia editors), then it sounds like original research. If it's Hazony, then let's just say that this is Hazony's conclusion. See what I mean? Thanks. Be well, HG | Talk 23:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Greetings, thanks for your prompt and nice reply. I appreciate the situation and empathize with you. Still, let me stick to your question: I would ask you then, is there any way to document all of this, without running afoul of original research? I'm afraid that we need to stick with reliable sources (which are mainly secondary sources, esp major media and scholarship). Wikipedia is merely a tertiary source. So the various emails and correspondence of our editors is not relevant. Don't forget, the reliable sources also help us identify what is notable for inclusion in an article. Until somebody publishes something about the relationship between these rabbis, it isn't within our policy framework to put it in the article. Even an unpublished letter from Rabbi Berkovits himself would not be relevant. Sorry about that. Ok? Thanks. Pls reply. Kol tuv, HG | Talk 23:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  on 04:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.


 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  02:58, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

The Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique [ approves | this | message  ] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  21:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Civil disobedience
Hi there - I've removed the text below from the article on Civil disobedience. I wanted to post here to explain why; Firstly, it's not really a reference (that is, something people can go an independently verify if they mistrust what the article says). I suppose it could be changed to refer people to the material that led you to your conclusions, but for the second reason I removed it; it is by its own admission original research. Hope this makes sense. - TB (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC) - -
 * I completely understand. The reason I put that reference there was precisely in order to notify others that it was original research. I didn't want the quotations from Pines-Paz and Shai to be juxtaposed with the material on Feiglin and Epstein, without others being notified that the juxtaposition itself was "original". Sevendust62 (talk) 21:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Sevendust62! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Eliezer Samson Rosenthal -

File:Rabbi glasner problem one.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rabbi glasner problem one.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Rabbi glasner problem three.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rabbi glasner problem three.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Rabbi glasner problem two.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rabbi glasner problem two.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hello Sevendust62,

please check Identifying reliable sources, Independent sources and Third-party sources. A representative of a political organization is not a neutral, third-party source, because he is connected and tied to the subject (i.e. the faction) itself. He speaks for the party/faction, but is not a reliable source for information about it. Third-party, or independent, and therefore reliable sources are sources from outside the movement. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 23:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eliezer Samson Rosenthal


The article Eliezer Samson Rosenthal has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Notability: pls see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)