User talk:Severnbore

Stourport-on-Severn
Okay... you added a link; I took it out; you've put it back again. Why? The link doesn't seem to have much specific relevance to Stourport - if it belongs anywhere then it belongs under River Severn - and the URL's similarity to your username would suggest that it's your personal website. A Wikipedia guideline says you should not add a "page that you own or maintain". It also doesn't help that you didn't explain why you'd put the link back; changes made without an edit summary are not helpful. So... why is this link appropriate for the page? Loganberry (Talk) 23:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Spamming / conflict of interest
You have added www.severntales.co.uk to a lot of articles. I am assuming that this is your own website as it redirects from www.severnbore.ndirect.co.uk. If this is the case then you are in real danger of being censured for spamming. At best this is conflict of interest. I would suggest that you remove the links from all articles except the River Severn article itself. --Cheesy Mike (talk) 18:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

http://severnbore.ndirect.co.uk no longer exists. I was simply changing to the new url of http://www.severntales.co.uk. There is nothing worse than being taken to dead links.


 * So it isn't your website? I do think you have put links to the site on too many articles and you might consider reducing the number before somebody else does. (Nice site though!) --Cheesy Mike (talk) 13:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Notices
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]

December 2007
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --h2g2bob (talk) 00:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Disasters on the Severn
I have nominated Disasters on the Severn, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Disasters on the Severn. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simple Bob (talk) 15:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)