User talk:Severo/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Severo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Bletchley parish boundary
Well spotted. My mistake for not checking my source. Please keep checking! Have a look at category:Milton Keynes as there are loads of articles that need a fresh eye. --Concrete Cowboy 22:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * A belated thanks. I will look through, but my knowledge of the rest of Milton Keynes pales compared to that of Bletchley! --Mk3severo 01:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Myra Wilson
Hi; the only noteworthy things I know about Myra Wilson were the things I put in the first version of her stub. If that's not enough, I won't oppose any deletion procedure. — Whitepaw 11:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Population of Beltchley
How did you define Bletchley for population, since that (I think) is collected at Parish level. I don't think you can just add West Bletchley and Bletchley and Fenny Stratford. --Concrete Cowboy 23:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * MKiObservatory is a good citation. You might need a footnote to say you define Bletchley to be contained by the A421, the southern city boundary and the A5, excluding Fenny Stratford.  (Or the combined parishes of West Bletchley and Bletchley and Fenny Stratford, excluding Fenny but that sounds pathetic).  You realise of course that a lot of this was built after designation.  --Concrete Cowboy 23:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, very arbitrary. That's why I asked, and why I think it is important that you state what it is that you are counting.  If you were very picky, you could define it just as Old Bletchley (a suburb of Fenny Stratford - Queensway used to be Bletchley Road, Fenny!).  The "Plan for Milton Keynes" (1971) gives the population of Bletchley then as 30,000 [from memory - needs checking if it matters.] --Concrete Cowboy 00:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Despite all of the above, I'm still worried so I've started a discussion at Talk:Bletchley, Milton Keynes. --Concrete Cowboy 19:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Abraham Olano
You have been using AWB to redirect links from Abraham Olano to Ábraham Olano. I don't know where that spelling comes from but it's not Spanish or Basque. I have redirected. Could you use AWB again to undo your changes? --Error 03:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

History of Milton Keynes
I've been slowly plodding along with History of Milton Keynes. I notice your interest in Bletchley and Local History, so wondered if you felt like contributing the Expansion of Bletchley section? The most accessible resource is at the Bletchley Clutch Club, it just needs to edited down viciously into a reasonable size section. --Concrete Cowboy 20:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Pronunciation of "Marseille"
I saw you edit the article Olympique de Marseille. So I guess you might be able to help me. I'm wondering what the pronunciation of the team is, Mar-say [maʀsɛj] or Mark-say [mɑxˈsɛjɐ], thanks --Manop - TH 22:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Diacritics
Hi. I couldn't help but notice your minor and careful edits on several pages (which I had on my watchlist): it is rare to see an Anglo-Saxon so welcoming and understanding of diacritics. Coming from a "diacritical" language/alphabet/culture, I feel obliged to thank you.; your edits are a sight for sore eyes (considering the sheer number of users who claim that diacritics "should not be featured on an English-language encyclopaedia" etc.). Dahn 14:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Campaign Against Homophobia
Hi, thanks for your edit. I appreciate, every change made by Wikipedians makes articles batter. Though, this article still needs a lot of work, probably mainly in the style department:) but hey, this is the disadvantage of not having English as a first language:> However, one thing you corrected, raised my eyebrow:) Polish title of the Festiwal Kultura dla Tolerancji w Krakowie is correct, and it cannot be "w Krakówie". I'll explain. Polish language is stuffed with irregularities; and nouns undergo declension, like in Latin or German:

nominative case (who? what?):         PL: Kraków,      EN: Kraków

genitive (to whom? to what?):          PL: Krakowowi    EN: to Kraków

dative (of who? of what?):             PL: Krakowa      EN: of Kraków

accusative (whom? what?):              PL: Kraków       EN: Kraków

instrumental (with whom? with what?):  PL: z Krakowem   EN: with Kraków

locative (in/about who? in/about what?) PL: w/o Krakowie EN: in/about Kraków

vocative (oh!)                         PL: o, Krakowie! EN: oh, Kraków!

In case of that sentence, locative case needs to be used. Gosh, look how lucky you are with English!:) PS.Wooops! I forgotten to sign my post! Boyau 23:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Ronde van Vlaanderen
Please read my comment on the above articles' talk page. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 6 Dec2006 21:34 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome
Hey Mk3, thanks for making me feel welcome. I intend to keep an eye on the cycling pages. As pointed out earlier, it would be nice to have a standard for cycling bio's for consistency. Thanks for providing all the links on how to get started. Cheers Santy.raghavan 04:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Predictor-Lotto
Robbie McEwen's page has the team named as Lotto-Domo from 2002, and in 2001 there was a team called Domo-Farm Frites, so that might be the name before Lotto-Domo. kju 00:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I've created a Template for the Predictor-Lotto team - I'm waiting on the press release of the new team line-up before making it live - I think I'm missing about 3 names, but I can't find any good sources for the missing ones, and I'm not 100% certain of the transferred 2006 riders.kju 05:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

UCI Pro Continental Teams for 2007 - Template
I've got a feeling that that is it when it comes to Pro-Continental Teams - the press release gave the impression that there weren't going to be any more. What do you think? kju 01:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Good point! I was incensed when they announced that Saiz still had the license, but sure enough, it went to Vino's Astana. Why do you think there are another 3 - were there 3 more last year? kju 02:38, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Igor González de Galdeano, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  14:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Saunier Duval Roster
Geraint Thomas needs to be removed, he rides for Barloworld now. (For the thing at the bottom of each Saunier Duval rider's page.) SportingNonsense 12:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC) I worked out how to change it myself, ill probably work on rosters like that for some continental teams now SportingNonsense 11:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Monarch at Manchester - citation
Hello Severo!

I've added more specific reference to Monarch passenger numbers at Manchester. Source is a printed annual booklet issued by the airport management and circulated to interested parties including airlines. No ISBN number is quoted, unfortunately!

Sincerely

Ringwayobserver, 23:02, January 29, 2007

Hello again, Severo !

Thanks for your Wikipedia message. You are quite right to 'quality check' info on WP - I'm currently in some dispute re another charter airline's WP site, where I think there's an obvious 'anonymous plugger' for the operator, who will not accept some honest facts I've contributed.

Back to Monarch ..

I've got the relevant publication for 2005 in my hand as I type ... It's published each year by Manchester Airport and is titled 'Traffic Statistics Report 200x' - in this case 2005. It contains 28 pages and is nicely printed using photo cover and coloured bar charts etc. Unfortunately no ISBN - I guess that is because it's not intended for public sale.

The publication is widely circulated to the airlines, airport staff, the airport's eleven controlling local authorities and other interested parties. I get a copy each year through a contact in the airport's management, and write a four-page honest commentary for a local aviation magazine with a circulation of around 2000 interested readers. Have never had any negative feedback from readers or management. That's because, like yourself, I do try to be both fair and objective in my writings.

If you are in the UK I could copy and 'snail mail' relevant pages to you.

Regards

'Ringwayobserver' Email: rascholefield@tiscali.co.uk

Hi Severo !

Thanks for your WP message.

The report is published by Manchester Airport Plc. No author stated. No date stated - but approx June 2006 - it took a while to be issued after the end of 2005! Pages 11 and 16 give the relevant passenger statistics for Monarch's scheduled and charter flights. Also for the other airlines using MAN - hence I could prepare a 'league table' using this info. Monarch's total pax rose to 1.72 million in 2005 - an increase of 10.6%, compared with 5.3% for total MAN passengers that year - so they outpaced the average.

I have never worked for, or been associated with, any airline. I therefore have no 'axe to grind' and can therefore keep a detached and analytical stance!

I'm new to Wikipedia (3 months) and am still 'learning the ropes' from such experienced operators as yourself !

Regards

Ringwayobserver

Random Smiley Award
 For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Awardoriginated by Pedia-I  (Explanation and Disclaimer)

--TomasBat (Talk) (Sign) 18:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais
Hello, An article that I created as a part of Wikiproject Cycling called Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais and linked to the Mount Tamalpais article, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais. Thank you, Bob in Las Vegas - uriel8   (talk)  11:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

CCC Polsat Polkowice
Hello Mk3severo. I wanted to thank you for your welcome and, more importantly, your correction of my errors on the CCC Polsat Polkowice site, and your contributions to cycling articles on Wikipedia generally. Best regards. Oberschlesien 23:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you again for your support and your cleaning up my articles. Please do inform me if there are any articles in particular that you would like created or expanded. I know more about road cycling itself than about other cyclists and cycling teams; I'm limited to providing material that is easily discoverable on the internet or in my university's academic resources. Oberschlesien 12:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Nice work on the Denbigh Stadium page!
I have kept an eye on this page for a while and was thinking only the other day that it's about time a newer more up to date picture was added. I hadn't bothered though because of the grief I got when I added the aerial shot of the build (There was an assumption that the pic I added was copyright protected when in fact I had obtained the author's permission, I just hadn't found the right tag to say so). Those pics are far more up to date. Do you think it's cool if I re-add my original one under yours on the left hand side though, as I think it's a nice one to have? Zorro77 16:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Logo source information
Please explain what you mean by information 'source'. I've just checked a selection of logos of large corporates that are on WP, and there is no source information on any of them. They pretty obviously orginated at that organisation. Mauls 23:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * All the logos have been cleaned up in Photoshop by myself, as shown in the metadata, therefore a URL can't be given. Also, I still fail to see any examples of where this has been done for other logos, including very prominent organisations. Mauls 00:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Several are also from off-line sources. Mauls 00:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I will where possible - in most cases the logo is present on the front page of the site, which would establish that it is fair-use. Mauls 00:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Menchov versus Menshov
Hi, I am not regularly online on this Wikipedia, but I saw you reverted the move of Menchov/Menshov. The Russian name is with ш, when transcripted to English, that means Menshov. Just because I was used to the English (Menchov) and Dutch transcription (Mentsjov), I thought his name was with a "ch", the letter ч. I moved the Dutch page to Mentsjov consistent with the English spelling Menchov. However, this is not right. The guy is called Menshov and that's why I changed the name. Cheers, Jalel 10:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Question
Hi,

Where do you get the codes from to put those tags saying what you like on your user page? Tom 10:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Question on GA review
I generally frown upon listing things in the article. It is not inappropriate to have some mention of his most important victories. Those can and should be included. The section as is, is just a bit of an overkill. I definitely think it needs a new a title unless the current title is used by the racing world, in which case it should be properly explained. Thanks for all your hard work on the article so far, it has great potential, good luck and I hope that answers your question. If not, inquire on my talk page. : ) IvoShandor 10:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * That sounds like a fair idea to me. If you don't like it later, it is always in the history.IvoShandor 11:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

A Sunday in Hell
Thank you for the note on The Hell of the North - I was unaware of the true origin of the phrase. I should have reserached more. Sorry for causing work - I appreciate your help. --Elwood90 08:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Eugène Christophe
I've been looking at improving the article on Eugène Christophe. The current article is at Eugene Christophe (no grave accent). Should I redirect existing references to EC to this article (I've done some, but now I'm having second thoughts), or create the article under Eugène Christophe and add a note on the existing article? Thanks. --Elwood90 10:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the help and encouragement --Elwood90 15:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Gilberto Silva
Thanks for fixing the tag screw up, good spot! -GilbertoSilvaFan 22:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * ...and again for fixing the Article Milestones box on Talk:Thierry Henry. I don't think I'll ever figure out how that damn template works. -GilbertoSilvaFan 22:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Track cycling
A good starting point might be memoire-du-cyclisme.net, selecting the 'Piste' option from the menu. I'm not sure how complete it is, but it includes championships, 6 days and major GPs. If you find anything on the MacGregor Cup (1870s proto-world championships?) let me know. Good luck! --Elwood90 09:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There's a list of champions to cross reference at this place, but still 'unofficial' I'm afraid. --Elwood90 09:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah ha! The UCI does have an archive hidden at this place. Certainly the sprint goes back to 1895 at first glance. --Elwood90 10:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No, no joy with the early World Cups I'm afraid. Beware that the UCI doesn't seem to include all events as well (motor pacing seems to be missing). --Elwood90 10:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)