User talk:Sewagecleaner

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Sewagecleaner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Firstsource have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 23:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2013
Please do not add POV and unsourced edits, as you did to the EasyJet article. Wikipedia is an encyclopia and not a forum for personal opinions and unsourced comments. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 16:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

April 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to CeX (company), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at CeX (company), you may be blocked from editing. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at CeX (company). – Davey 2010 Talk 09:10, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * With regard to your edits on Cex, you may want to take heed of wp:soap as well - Wikipedia is not a soapbox for you to stand upon and voice what is (currently) only your own opinion. Chaheel Riens (talk) 16:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 09:58, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to CeX (company) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your email
You just sent me a nasty mail accusing me of something I am not. I don't like email communication, and for the sake of openness and public record, am posting the exact contents of your mail here:

Sewagecleaner  to:	Rsrikanth05  date:	5 May 2015 at 13:23 subject:	Wikipedia email mailed-by:	wikimedia.org

I'm not surprised. You are just another stooge who'll do anything to be on CeX's payroll.

By the way, you may be able to bully me on Wikipedia for sometime. However, you really have no luck and control over all the on-line medium and all the time.

MORAL OF THE STORY: THOSE WHO LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES DO NOT THROW STONES AT OTHER!

-- This email was sent by user "Sewagecleaner" on the English Wikipedia to user "Rsrikanth05". It has been automatically delivered and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot be held responsible for its contents.

The sender has not been given the recipient's email address, nor any information about his/her email account; and the recipient has no obligation to reply to this email or take any other action that might disclose his/her identity. If you respond, the sender will know your email address. For further information on privacy, security, and replying, as well as abuse and removal from emailing, see .


 * For the record, I am NOT on anyones payroll, nor does anybody pay me to edit Wikipedia. I undid your edit for many reasons, including:


 * It was unsourced,
 * It was not written with a neutral point of view,
 * It was original research.

Do not make such accusations in the future without any evidence. I am also pinging an admin t let them know of your behaviour. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)