User talk:Sewellshields

May 2017
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jonjo Shelvey have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Sewellshields, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jonjo Shelvey. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jonjo Shelvey was changed by Sewellshields (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851263 on 2017-05-09T10:32:41+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jonjo Shelvey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Johnuniq (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Stones, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: John Stones was changed by Sewellshields (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855603 on 2017-05-09T11:51:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jermain Defoe. Shellwood (talk) 11:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lewis TNE Yeoman


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:Lewis TNE Yeoman, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jdcomix (talk) 13:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Katietalk 13:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)