User talk:Sewoman

Speedy deletion nomination of Ron Rushing
A tag has been placed on Ron Rushing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 13:49, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ron Rushing


A tag has been placed on Ron Rushing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 14:06, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ron Rushing


A tag has been placed on Ron Rushing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Syrthiss (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ron Rushing. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 15:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Ron Rushing. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:44, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Ron Rushing
When I read the article you wrote, it reads like a pamphlet Rushing himself would write and distribute to his constituents. This violates Wikipedia's neutrality policy, hence the tagging of the article as advertizement.

Merely running for office is not sufficient for a Wikipedia article. You have to show that the candidate is getting significant attention from the media, that is, that the media is not treating him as an "also ran." And to avoid neutrality issues, it would be preferable if the article were entirely written from information found in the media, except for trivial information that won't affect how voters might view him. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Ron Rushing
Blanchardb has said most of what I was going to. I would ask you to read WP:POLITICIAN where it specifies that being a candidate for office is not notable in itself and the notability otherwise of the subject has to be taken into account. Mr Rushing appears to be a very worthy citizen, but I'm afraid that doesn't count for an encyclopaedia entry. Saints (but not even all of them) and mass murderers are fairly sure of a place, but the worthy citizen is assumed to be common enough not to need noting. Look at WP:BIO to see if there is anything there that would help you. You know him - I'm just going by the article. Whatever you do, you must use independent sources. Own sites can be linked to, but info should be referenced in a way that complies with WP:RS (reliable sources). This helps to protect you and us from possible libel suits. I often wish the subjects of deleted luck - but I don't in politics as I remain apolitical. I am willing to help any side with advice if it's requested. Peridon (talk) 16:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * By the way, I would repeat ReaperEternal's warning about removing speedy deletion tags. It isn't allowed on pages you have created yourself and can really lead to blocking from editing. It also doesn't do any good, as someone will put it back again (there's even a bot that does it), and the article's in a list anyway. Peridon (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)