User talk:Sfacets/arch1

Melbourne meetup
I'm sure you will have a lot of interesting experiences to bring to the table. What made you want to try to come to meetups? I hope you have a great time when we do have our next one. --EuropracBHIT 02:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC).

"See Also" in Tupac Shakur
Rather than get into a revert war over this, I was hoping you could explain why you think Tupac Amaru and Tupac Inca Yupanqui are relevent to Tupac's name. I took them out because neither page mentions Tupac, and Tupac Amaru (and Tupac Shakur) specifically mention that Tupac was named after Tupac Amaru II. &mdash;Seqsea (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Which section am I supposed to have removed? cairoi 03:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

The ==Rick Ross== section was removed by you, according to the article's history. Sfacets 04:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Delete_unused_username_after_90_days
You wrote: "It should depend on how many posts has been made under the username... if over a certain amount then more time alloted before removal." - however, the policy is only about people who never ever made even one post.I can only understand your comment if you did not fully read this part. Or maybe I am misinterpreting what you are saying? (PS: I deleted your comment, please add it back in, in case you really think it makes sense!) Msoos 16:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

I apologise! It must have just been a timing thing. I certainly had no intention of removing Rick Ross. cairoi 21:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Quick Indian links
Hi Sfacets, here are some links for Indian (or Indian lovers!) Wikipedians which may be useful.

Thanks, GizzaChat  &#169; 07:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Kellie Everts
I'm suspicious that the user Mothergodchurch may intend to continue adding unverified info to the Kellie Everts page. It looks like this user is either Kellie herself, or someone acting on her behalf with the intention of promoting her. Obviously, I'm in favor of a fact-based article, without claims of miracles and other unsubstantiated views. Do you know the appropriate way to deal with this if it continues? fbb_fan 04:01, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Removed out of context question
I noticed you removed a comment from a talk page Talk:Yoga. Please do not bite the newcomers. I feel it would be more appropriate to just answer the questions or refer them to were it should be answered. A revert is a little too harsher. This is how I dealt with it --E-Bod 16:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I Have Edited my above post because I made some False Accusations That are hurtful and not though out and I Apologize. Your Course of Action was appropriate but I only wanted to point out another option that I preferred.--E-Bod 01:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Historical Jesus
Please don't jump to conclusions. I was answering your comments regarding Historical Jesus as you contacted me at my talk page. I didn't find an edit summary comment neccesary for my reversion at the Common Era article because you altered information without discussion or any reason. Please refer to my comments at Talk:Common Era, and no my actions do not merit a block. &mdash; CRAZY `( IN )` SANE 13:16, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.Loom91 18:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Shame on you Vandalism Unit!
Feel the shame of removing linkspam. -Will Beback 07:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Neem Karoli Baba
Please do not move Neem Karoli Baba. Like many spiritual teachers, he did not use his birth name. There are several books about him and he is mentioned in many other and they ALL refer to him as Neem Karoli Baba. He ashrams use that name as well, both in the US and India. Also, you should know better than to move articles by cut and paste. It loses the edit history which is required to maintain the requirements of the GFDL license under which the contributors have donated their work. &mdash;Hanuman Das 13:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Ganshyam Pande
Hi there, Sfacets. You can't just move an article to a new title. An action like that must be voted on on the discussion page, regardless of how wrong you think that current article title is. I'll be reverting your changes. Regards, &mdash; goethean &#2384; 22:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Ananta Das Babaji
You've just moved an article under a new name with copy-paste and redirect... That aside, you've labeled it as "actual name" whereas "Ananta Das Babaji" is the actual name, and the rest are titles. Reverting. I appreciate the intention, but please be a bit mindful on how you edit. ---Raga 23:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

hi
Maybe so but since the content is part of the explanation for the word sannyassin, known in the west as followers of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, the word has gotten another meaning but the hindustani. So instead of removing I suggest you add explanation and alternative links to this, especially since other wikipedia pages have gracefully accepted the links to the pages you refer to as 'my own', as a well expressed part of an explanation for a term. I suggest to re-place the previous content and leave one link to a sannyassin story on 'my web'. And please put your explanation as the classic hindu sadhu- sannyasa in there too. ShanT

Orange people
You had saved your article, so presumably you were ready for it to be edited. It gave no context or country. jimfbleak 06:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The lowercase "west" threw me - I assumed it was the west of somewhere, rather than the West. Many articles are marked as stubs and never returned to, but I accept that I may have been over hasty - I'll take another look. jimfbleak
 * It's difficult to see how this stub can be expanded without repeating chunks of the Rajneesh article, so I've done a merge and redirect. If there is enough material, it can always be split off again at a later date. jimfbleak 07:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Novels
Hi thank you for joining the WikiProject. There is still plenty of scope for influencing things and making your contribution count. We are about establishing standards for Novel based articles and writing articles that meet our own and others high standards, and to improve Wikipedia's diet of articles on Fiction books, otherwise called Novels. Can I ecnourage you to place our userbox on you page, . If you have any questions, do ask. Please be very welcome. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  12:35, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Maharishi page
The site you are using as your source for the mantras is.... well.... nothing. It doesn't say what it is. It needs to be a reputable source or we need to take the material out. I am a critic of the TM program for sure, check out the transcendental meditation page... and I have yet to find a decent source for the mantras.

Even if we could find such a source, I don't see what listing them in the article does? Maybe in the TM article (and if you look there I have already inserted, with sources, that they are Bija mantras), but why stick it in the Maharishi article?

Find a good source, and that material can stay. Sethie 08:15, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

SFacets, get your facts together before throwing accussations around. No vandalism has been taking place on the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi article. Moreover, since you appear to be off-line quite a bit, feel free to check the current state of affairs, before shooting yourself in the foot:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Transcendental_meditation

user:Peterklutz

Massive reversion at Tourism
Hi. You recently did a massive reversion of the Tourism article, described as a revert of vandalism, which as far as I can tell took the article back several months to an inferior version, with lots of errors and a NPOV dispute, losing a considerable amount of text and a large number of edits in the process. Can I check this wasn't a simple error? Could you point out the vandalism, and which version you reverted to so we can build the article back up again. Would you consider undoing your revert and simply correcting any vandalism you perceive. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 01:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, Sorry about that, what happened is that a user added a bit on nonsense to the article, and while I was working on reverting it, another user reverted it, meaning that I reverted to a version prior to the previous revert. I reverted back - everything should be in order now. Sfacets 01:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I thought it would be something like that :) -- zzuuzz (talk) 01:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Names of Krishna
Hi. I see you put the names section (which I had been maintaining) back into the article. It suffers from the regular insertion of names / titles that a few users know but which are not in common use. Hence it now includes some names that are little known; perhaps you would be able to judge which these are and tidy up the section. Thanks, Imc.

Article : Pramukh Swami Maharaj. Citations.
Hi,

I have provided the required citations regarding the largest hindu temple outside India. The temple created by Pramukh Swami Maharaj holds the Guiness world record. I have provided an image for the same from the website of the temple.

I dont know if the image is copyrighted or not. Can you please help ?

In addition to above, I have also provided the link for list of achievements and the list of activities performed under swamiji's guidance. Should I directly include the list in the Wikipedia or just maintain the links ??

Thanks and Regards,

Uday 10:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

List of casualties of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan listed for deletion
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of casualties of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, has been listed at Articles for deletion/List of casualties of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Good day mate

 * ) Just wanted to say hello and howdy. Looks like we have many similar interests, including keeping the TM pages as neutral and non-advertisement like as possible!

Our paths my cross in the offline world... not only is India on my to travel to list (already have once), but so is.... Melbourne! One of my spiritual mentors lives in your neck of the wood, Bob Adamson!

See ya on the pages,

Sethie 02:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the message.

our friend
I think the next step is a RFC. Just make sure you keep a cool head and continue to try and resolve the issues. Have you ever done one, and/or do you have any interest in doing one? Sethie 03:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Howdy - yes I agree, (no, have never done one) however we should wait untill he further edits the articles. First of all though, he should be reported for using two (or more?) usernames to make edits to articles. What do you think? Sockpuppets usually get banned indefinitely from wikipedia.

Just to be clear - my aim is not to absolutely censor the guy, but make sure the articles in question aren't used as PR or promotion of TM. What makes it difficult is his edits, many of which are clear acts of vandalism.

Let's give it a few hours, and then call in the cavalry (RFC) ;)

The cavalry. Yeah, WE might be the cavalry. RFC's are quite a bif of work....

I am on the same page as you, I actually like the direction the articles are headed, just not dealing with the sockpuppetry and a few other shenanagans. My goal would not be total censure either.

Well, it's bedtime over here, I'm sure by tommorow everything'll be very different. Sethie 04:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Don's talk (moved from my Userpage)
Hi Sfacets...

I am being vandalized by one or two people on Sahaj Marg where you left me a "heads up" on Ban of Gay and lesbians"

I don't see them in the History but my pages are changed...One Ip address has a lot of warnings on his talk page.... How can I tell who is doing it? There is no history. the numbers are 87.48.115.147 which I think is not doing it but there is this one who has a lot of warnings on his site...203.199.211.18 he seem to be using a bot...Can you advise me how to deal with Vanalism??

PS I have tried to keep your edit on Gays and Lesbians on Sahaj Marg site but It got watered down as the editor claims that there are now preceptors and abhyasis in the Mission...I am trying to keep the "tone" of the speech intact...Let me know if that is clear to you and accurate to what you see....If you have any other info, please go and add to the data base on-line...

thanks for the info...will you post it in my talk page or will I pick it up here....I check out the Sahaj Marg page regularly so you can communicate there...if that is OK...

Thanks

Don...

Image copyright problem with Image:Jerrybrukheimer.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jerrybrukheimer.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Sectes
J'sus intéressé par votre avis sur certaines de mes entrées sur la liste de groupes désignés sous le nom des sectes. Spécifiquement comment les entrées enrichissent ou dégradent la liste. Je pense que montrer toutes sortes des sectes est absolument nécessaires selon les règles courantes mais je trouve la discussion impossible sur la page de conversation. S'il vous plait, excusez mon français pauvre. J'sus seulement un anglophone. Peut-être vous pouviez les entrées suivantes. Merci pour la consideration. cairoi 01:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Alchoholics Anonymous, Communal/Institutional (Chaz Bufe) (Rutger's Centre of Alcohol Studies)
 * Chado, the cult of the the Japanese tea ceremony (NY Times)
 * Cult of Buai (Oceania, Vol. 65, 1995)
 * Cult of the Virgin Mary (Michael Horton)(International Journal for the Psychology of Religion)
 * Cult of the Sacred Heart (Michael P Carroll)
 * Cult of Saints (Michael Horton)
 * Holy Ghost People, Church of God/Snake-Handling cult (George Dearborn Spindler)
 * Ma Tsu cult (Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 30, No. 4 (Oct., 1988), pp. 674-697)
 * Meher Baba cult (Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion)
 * Psychology of the self (Jungian) <small style="color: green;">(Paul C Vitz, Head of Psychology, NYU) <small style="color: green;">(American Historical Review)
 * Rastafarianism <small style="color: green;">(Leonard E Barrett)


 * Je suis tout a fait d'accord sur l'idée d'inclure toutes les organisations qui adherent aux principes décrits selon les critères établies sur l'article. (Actually I do speak english, it's my mother tongue ;) )

I plan on paying closer attention to this article, and look forward to joining in the discussion on why it is essential for a balanced and non-Pov article to include a varied list of 'any' organisation that has been described as a sect. (I was actually just about to add AA myself, when I noticed you had just added it to the list). Sfacets 04:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Formidable! I'm really just an anglophone but the school system here promotes French too.  I try to take any opportunity to practice as 6 years in Oz has left me pretty rusty I only spoke french with a couple Tahitians and and Irishwoman the whole time I was down there.  Anyhoo, I'm looking forward to seeing your edits and development of opinion on the list.  It's a tough crowd; brace yourself.  And thank you for the feedback.  cairoi 16:19, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Please use the talk page of an article to improve the article
This message is with regards to your edit at Talk:International Society for Krishna Consciousness. Talk pages of articles should not be used to recruit supporters to push a POV in other. articles, but only for improving the article. See talk page. Apart from that your description of the article guru is a complete misrepresentation of the article. Andries 20:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

It isn't pushing a POV, merely gathering opinions on what should be done in the article before reaching concensus and acting upon it.

Some religions have a portal, such as portal:Hinduism, other do not, which is why I left a request on the ISKON page for peer review, as they too are concerned by the undergoings in the Guru article.

I don't believe that my description is a misrepresentation, as I based it on the talk and described what was going on.

It is important to get peer review, so that people like yourself (who have openly admitted they wish to push their POV) do not succeed in doing so. Sfacets 21:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Please use the appropriate channels to get a peer review. Making announcement on the talk pages of remotely related articles to recruit people who have the same POV as you is not the right way to do it. Andries 21:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

How is it recruiting? I was posting the situation in talk pages frequented by people who are knowledgable in the subject. (awaiting your answer after your 24 hour block for violation of the 3RR Rule). Sfacets 22:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Invitation and Recommendations for writing articles on Hindi Wikipedia
<blockquote style='border: 1px solid blue; padding: 2em;'> Hindi wikipedia invites and welcomes Wikipedians to contribute for the cause of spreading knowledge and the Hindi language. This page contains guidelines for writing a wiki-article on any topic at the Hindi Wikipedia, with special recommendations for writing in Hindi (Note: The script/font-family for Hindi is Devanāgari; the script/font-system for English is Roman script, also, the Hindi spelling system is not completely standardized). This article is yet in English language (mostly), in order to encourage even non-native/foreign people who have learnt/are learning Hindi to contribute to the Hindi wikipedia, and native Hindi speakers who normally write in English. The examples given below are only for explanation.

Recommendations:
 * 1) Firstly for proper viewing, it is recommended to keep all links NOT-UNDERLINED. Otherwise the मात्रा below the Hindi alphabets might get partly hidden behind the underlines. For this, please go to My Preferences (मेरी पसंद) at the top of the page, then click Misc., and then choose "underline links -> Never". Save your settings. Also, do not click yes for "justify paragraphs", otherwise on some browsers, the devanagari script will appear highly distorted.
 * 2) All users are requested and encouraged to contribute articles here, especially, to create new articles on general topics. They are also encouraged to expand the existing articles, and improve upon them. A non-user can also do the same; it is recommended but not required to register yourself as a wikipedian user at the Hindi wikipedia. As far as possible, each article should be written with a Neutral Point of View (NPOV)—no nationalistic or partiality or hatred based articles are welcome. The articles should be based on facts—and appropriate references should be provided as and where needed. See the English wiki's help page for editing in general. Almost all the general wiki-features are available for editing on Hindi wiki too. Guidelines for the content matter is mostly the same as given in English wiki.
 * 3) Since the Hindi wiki is at its initial stages, users are welcome to take introduction and basic points from the English (or another) wikipedia's corresponding article and translate them for small articles. An in-page link to the English wiki's article will be deemed sufficient for references (a template might be created stating this). For longer articles, it is recommended to mention the references separately.
 * 4) Since most computer users in India and elsewhere have the standard Western-type keyboard, it is best recommended (but not necessarily required) to use the virtual (software) keyboard like the one of Hindimozhi or of ISIS (Tavultesoft Keyman)—which are freewares. These are advantageous because the contemporary Hindi-speakers in India often write messages/chat using Hindi words but written in Roman (English) script, and the layout of these keyboards is quite the same that such people use. For example, using the "normal" keyboard with this software, typing ga would give ग and ghaa would give घा.
 * 5) Create the article with its name written in Hindi (devanagari script). Always take care to include the nukta (dot below) for foreign / Urdu loanwords wherever it occurs in the standard spelling. For non-Indian names, use that spelling (for article name and other words) which is commonly encountered in Hindi newspapers, G.K.-books, Hindi-dubbed TV documentaries and Hollywood films and magazines. e.g., America-अमरीका (या अमेरिका), China-चीन, French-फ़्रांसिसी. For English acronyms/short-forms, use the initials in Roman script, and again create a full form in Hindi and redirect it to the short form. e.g. IPA (अन्तर्राष्ट्रीय ध्वनि वर्णाक्षर); UNO (संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ). Doing the opposite is also fine. But creating the article with the Hindi short form, as सं०रा०सं०, is not recommended. Also, the article proper must be written with the proper nukta, as फ़ारसी, and then, a non-nukta (mis-)spelt version फारसी should preferably be created to redirect to the correct spelling.
 * 6) Hindi wikipedia strongly recommends the users to write articles in everyday common Hindi in the खड़ीबोली dialect (Hindustani or Hindi-Urdu, i.e., बोलचाल वाली हिन्दी, which may include many loanwords from Persian and Arabic). The use of शुद्ध संस्कृतनिष्ठ हिन्दी is in general neither required nor recommended. E.g., use: वजह instead of कारण, ख़ास instead of विशेष, वगैरह instead of इत्यादि, लेकिन instead of परन्तु etc. However, for technical and specialized vocabulary, the use of शुद्ध संस्कृतनिष्ठ हिन्दी  is recommended and usually mandatory. Thus: upper House of Parliament—संसद का उच्च सदन, but not Urdu—मजिलिस का ऐवान-ए-बाला ; Foreign Minister—विदेशमन्त्री, but not Urdu—वज़ीर-ए-ख़ारिजा ; knowledge/science—ज्ञान/विज्ञान, but not इल्म. Use spoken Hindi's ये and वो instead of यह and वह / वे. Do not use the title of respect जी after names, it is unencyclopedic. Thus: कृष्ण / श्री कृष्ण but not कृष्ण जी. Use the आप form and its corresponding 3rd person verbal conjugation for writing about respectable persons. Thus: श्री वाजपेयी मध्य प्रदेश में जन्मे थे. But not: वाजपेयी मध्य प्रदेश में जन्मा था. But do not use the pronoun "आप" itself in-text in biographies.
 * 7) English should be used sparingly, only when required; i.e., if the corresponding शुद्ध हिन्दी word is too "difficult and not generally encountered", or if it is a proper name of non-Indian person/place/terminology/title, or if the user is highly unsure of the proper translation. It is recommended (but not required) for English-to-Hindi translation while writing articles, the Shabdkosh online dictionary should be used. For each English word, that alternative should be used which is generally encountered in everyday spoken Hindi, and also fits well into the context. Use of intelligent guesses for newly encountered words is also allowed, and so are translations encountered in Hindi-dubbed TV documentaries, Hollywood films, Hindi-translated books, etc. e.g., दमपिशाच for en:Dementor (used in dubbed HP films).
 * 8) If used, it is recommended to use the English words within the articles using the English (Roman) alphabets rather than devanagari (or better, the devanagari transliteration should be used in the sentence, followed by the English word in Roman alphabet in parentheses). Such words should be italicized and not put in quotation marks. Preferably, there should be an in-page interwiki link (like :en:) on the word to the English wikipedia. If the word comes as an integral part of a sentence, so as not to break the continuity, the en: prefix should be hidden by writing the word again after the pipe sign (piped link). Thus, recommended:  Whence,
 * 9) *हैरी पॉटर ने Pensieve के अन्दर Little Hangleton गाँव में लॉर्ड वोल्डेमॉर्ट की माँ Merope Gaunt को देखा
 * 10) *Resplendent Quetzal पक्षी के ऊपर एक मेक्सिकन पादरी डा० Pablo de la Llave ने काफ़ी शोध किया था
 * 11) Always start the first 1 or 2 lines of the article giving its definition (from any standard dictionary/other wiki) or suitable introduction. Thus, recommended: ललिता सहस्रनामन हिन्दू धर्मसुधारक आदि शंकराचार्य द्वारा रचित देवी दुर्गा को समर्पित एक पूजा-मन्त्र है, जिसे कई हिन्दू रोज़ श्रद्धा से जपते हैं । But not: ललिता सहस्रनामन मन्त्र जपने के लिये लड्डू-पेड़ा, ताम्बुल, सिन्दूर, लाल चुनरी के साथ नित्य इस मन्त्र का पाठ करें, तो जल्द ही गड़ा हुआ ख़जाना मिलेगा । Recommended: वैमानिक अभियान्त्रिकी (en:Aeronautical engineering) विमानों (en:Aircrafts) की अभिकल्पना, निर्माण और प्रचालन करने का विज्ञान, कला और कार्य है । (translated from Eng. Webster's New World Dictionary). But not: आजकल वैमानिक अभियान्त्रिकी के लिये देशभर में कई कॉलेज खुल गये हैं, जिनमें अग्रणी स्थान यूटोपिया स्थित लालू-यादव टेक्लिनक कॉलेज का है ।
 * 12) For names of countries, cities, places, languages, people, books, films, technical vocabulary, mythology, etc, start the article like this:
 * 13) * 1.
 * 14) * 2.
 * 15) * 3. phonological transcription
 * 16) * 4.  For country names, only the standard short form of the name is needed in the first line. If there is a common name for a difficult word in Hindustani, also mention it. Whence: अपोलो (अंग्रेज़ी : en:Apollo; यूनानी : Aπollων अपोल्लोन) प्राचीन यूनानी धर्म (ग्रीक धर्म) और प्राचीन रोमन धर्म के सर्वोच्च देवता थे । If you don't give the interwiki English/another language link (which would be deemed to be the default reference), then you MUST provide an appropriate reference.
 * 17) Please leave no article without an appropriate category. See the list of created categories here; you can also make a new category (pref. in Hindi). Please leave no article without at least ONE off page (like en:) interwiki link. E.g., the user can check the article name (say Apollo) on the finally redirected English page and append to the Hindi article . These interlanguage links will help a bot to update all interwiki links for that article in all wikipedias. The category and the aforementioned link should be typed at the end of the article. If the article is very small, mention it as a stub/substub.
 * 18) Use of templates is welcome. See the list of templates here. If creating a template, name it pref. in Hindi.
 * 19) Use पूर्णविराम ( । ) instead of a period (.) for ending statements. The पूर्णविराम, semicolon, colon and dash (but not comma) must come after one space after the word to prevent ambiguity. Use the international form of the Hindu-Arabic numerals (1,2,3 instead of १,२,३), as used by the Constitution and the Government of India (even for Hindi). There is no need to use the हलन्त at the end of Sanskrit words wherever it occurs. Hence, prefer: संसद over संसद्; अथर्वन over अथर्वन्. Use the proper quotation marks “” from the Insert toolbox, not "". Write dates as 2 मई 2006 (ईसवी or ईसापूर्व). Write time as 3:45 pm. Separate common suffix-words like शास्त्र, विज्ञान, ज्ञान with a hyphen. Thus: रसायन-शास्त्र. For most others, leave both the words of the noun-cluster free. Combine them into one word only if it is very common to do so. Thus: सामवेद.
 * 20) The use of ज़ for the en:voiced alveolar fricative (/z/, as in zoo, rose) is fundamentally wrong. Its nearest counterpart is the en:voiceless alveolar fricative /s/ (as in sea), and not Hindi ज (en:voiced palatal plosive). Hence, it is suggested and recommended that for the sound /z/, whether it comes in English (etc.) spellings (z) for while pronunciation otherwise, should be transcribed as स़ (स with a dot below, available in the Insert toolbox). Hence: Reason रीस़न, not रीज़न ; Roses रोस़ेस़, not रोज़ेज़. But common Hindi words borrowed from Persian/Arabic (so-called Urdu words) are allowed to continue with ज़ spelling. Thus: ज़रा, नज़र, तर्ज़. The en:voiced postalveolar fricative (/ʒ/ as in treasure), inexistent in Hindi, can similarly be transcribed with श़. Thus: treasure ट्रॅश़र. The nukta (dot) available in the Insert toolbox can be combined with various consonants to suggest a more exact phonetic devanagari rendering of foreign sounds. E.g., since phonetically, English Think and this are not equal to थिंक and दिस, a better transcription could be थ़िंक and द़िस. Please take care of the dot below in so-called Urdu words, otherwise the Hindi spelling is deemed incorrect.
 * 21) For the following English vowels met, mate, mat, transcribe as मॅट (short vowel), मेट (not मेइट), मैट (not मॅट, as popular in Marathi). However in contemporary Hindi and here, it is acceptable to use ए instead of ऍ. Thus: अमेरिका is more popular than अमॅरिका. For cot, coat, caught, transcribe as कॉट, कोट, कॉट (not कौट). Transcribe English /t/ and /d/ as ट and ड.
 * 22) Use half-न before त, थ, द, ध, न, instead of anuswaar अं. Use half-म before प, फ, ब, भ, म. Use the anuswaar before all the rest of the consonants (not half-ङ, ञ, ण). If the मात्रा is not above the alphabet, use chandra-bindu, but only for nasalization. Thus: अन्दर, not अंदर ; अन्त, not अंत ; हिन्दी, not हिंदी ; सम्भव, not संभव ; पंचमी, not पञ्चमी ; अंडा, not अण्डा ; कंठ, not कण्ठ ; लैंड, not लैण्ड ; आँख, not आंख. However, both forms are acceptable in contemporary Hindi as well as here; the prec. are just recommendations.
 * 23) When proceded by another vowel, use the pure vowels instead of य (unless the य is clearly articulated while pronouncing). Thus : जाएँ, not जायें (not जावें) ; आएगा, not आयेगा . However, both forms are acceptable in contemporary Hindi as well as here.
 * 24) Please pay careful attention to the masculine/feminine gender (and singular/plural) in adjectives and verbs, else the sentence becomes ungrammatical.

For more information/suggestions/criticisms, please contact any one of the administrators of Hindi wiki here, preferably en:User:Magicalsaumy.

This page can also be found here. Thank you,

Cygnus_hansa 02:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

on Amir Massoud Tofangsazan
Hi, you reinserted the tag on the Amir Massoud Tofangsazan article. I am finding trying to maintain the current backlog a bit of a nightmare, to say the least. The original policy for use of the current tag is discussed here.Template_talk:Current. I would appreciate any comments you have on the general use of this tag there.

The original idea was to tag articles which were rapidly changing, however its clearly not being used for that any more.

In this case do you think it is valid to maintain the tag as long as the blog is up? This could well be years. GameKeeper 16:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I see what you mean - The tag as described in the discusson on template policy would suggest that it is overkill to use it for this article when compared to articles with a higher edit rate. In this case mainly what is changing daily is the blog stats...

Feel free to remove the tag (Or I will tommorow) - it's a shame there isn't a similar tag(?) for this kind of situation seems like a good system, if only the backlog could be maintained. I will comment in more depth tommorow... Sfacets 16:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

INCOTW - Islam in India
You voted for Islam in India, this week's '''[[WP:INCOTW|Indian Colloboration of the

Bhagwan Swaminarayan Article
bhagwan Swaminarayan article has fallen victim to people with covert agendas. This is something even more serious than vandalism

I suggest following to be done to give justice to this article.


 * Modify the article of religious figure Swaminarayan as biography. menitioning the life, work, teachings of swaminarayan and the cultural revolution in Gujarat that he initiated and guided.


 * Trying not to include the modern disputed content. Instead putting forth different views prevailing about Swaminarayan. The current article depicts only the propaganda of kalupur branch of the sect.


 * Creation of a neutral history of swaminarayan sect which depicts the emergance of various sects, their beliefs and their works.

Please let me know if you want me to make aware any other contributors of Wikipedia.

Please do reply to my talk page.

Uday 11:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Reply
I posted a reply on my talk page. I probably should have posted it on yours... Here goes me, making a mess of Wikipedia again. Anyway, so yeah there it is. -- JD talkemail 17:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Bias in South Asian Studies
You wrote to me to say that I had "vandalized" the webpage: Bias in South Asian Studies. I am sorry if that is what seemed to have happened. I was trying to start a discussion. I recently signed up with Wikipedia and thought that I was going about the process in the correct fashion. I am logged on and I left a message, but if you saw it as vandalism then I must have done something wrong. How does one go about bringing attention to a page that was eliminated. I read the comments on page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bias_in_South_Asian_Studies

I felt that the reasoning for eliminating the webpage were insufficient.

Thanks, YRosser

Bias in South Asian Studies
Perhaps you can tell me the process... since I am new to Wikipedia and you were the first editor type person to contact me...

There is a page that shows the discussion regarding why the page on the Bias in South Asian Studies was paired down and rerouted to Indology. During that discussion, my name is repeatedly mentioned, with derogatory, pejorative tones by one person that seems to have an agenda. He/she dismissed my main work with Sindhis and Badshah Khan, and my analyses about Indian Studies, and implicated me as evil simply because I was in a terrible auto accident and while I was in a coma a group had a fund raiser for me. This person didn't like that group, I myself have differences with them, but I had helped them on an education project. Therefore, when I had the near fatal accident, they had an on-line fund raiser. That information is still on their website. That is the proof of my unqualification to contribute, offered by the person who worked the hardest to remove the page on the Bias in South Asian Studies. That person’s agenda was in full view. He/she also told a lie based on what he/she supposedly "heard" at UT Austin. Hearsay gossip, with no basis in reality should not play a part in editorial decisions. I did not get kicked out of the Asian Studies PhD program. I received my masters--my thesis was a study of the representation of India in World History textbooks. The chair of the department of Curriculum and Instruction invited me to come to her department to do my PhD. She made the offer very attractive. When I was a in the Department of Asian Studies I had worked almost fulltime was the Outreach Coordinator. I liked my job because it was about educating about Asia and that is why I chose to get my PhD in Curriculum Studies, where I could study the representation of India in mainstream academia.

To whom should I write to object to the slanderous tone that was used against me and that was therefore successful in removing a worthy webpage. Like one of the editors said, there are web pages about bias against many other disciplines… why should we hide the bias in South Asian Studies? We should talk about it and get it out in the open and see if it is impacting the field. Denying the phenomenon will not neutralize it.


 * You could ask to be reviewed Deletion_review, however it is important that a neutral tone and content are maintained in an article... it seems unlikely seeing the amount of contreversy surrounding this issue that you would be able to re-open the article.

Regarding the slanderous tone, not much can be done, unfortunately... unless a user/users have been behing a personal attack.

Perhaps you could elaborate any criticisms you have concerning the issues regarding bias in South Asian Studies in the indology article as a section - once the section attains a certain size and relevance (cites unbiased and relevant sources and backs up any criticism made) then it could always eventually be re-instated.

Don't hesitate to ask if you need any further assistance, I will also be keeping an eye on any bias appearing on the Indology article.

Sfacets 09:13, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Ganesh
Dear Sfacets

Thank you for your help.

I have posted a response to you at the Ganesh page.

There are many traditions about Shiv(a) and Ganesh(a).

One of them is the Jat tradition. This tradition is very ancient and has been published by many historians.

The files section of Jathistory group, contains the books in an online downloadble version.

A Yahoo ID and Membership is required for the files section, and we have that restriction to prevent trolls.I am a moderator for that group.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JatHistory/ You are welcome to join, review, and pass comment

I am not keen on revert and revert activity. There is too much of that already. I have written to Kartik Raman too

Could we bring the republican section back in ?

Best regards

Ravi Chaudhary 16:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

WOT Template
Sorry I left a response to you on the template page, but have not managed to get a reply. If you can, can you point me to the discussion on the globalize tag, thanks. -- zero faults   ' '' 10:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Nagpurhighcourt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nagpurhighcourt.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Wrong place to report Peterklutz
His edits appear to be a content dispute, and may involve personal attacks or 3RR violations; but they don't meet the project-wide definition of vandalism. (Vandalism includes things like blanking pages or writing "poop" in the middle of an article). You might try reporting him on WP:AN3 or WP:PAIN instead of WP:ANI. --EngineerScotty 23:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Copyright disputed
Hi, I have added your image Image:Devilll.jpg to Possibly unfree images. Please see that page for my reasoning. Note that I believe you may be able to leave the image on wikipedia, but it should be licensed under fair use NOT under copyright released. Nil Einne 19:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi, further to the above, I've looked at the other image you uploaded Image:Ebayfraudster.jpg. Firstly, it's in the wrong category. More importantly, I've reconsidered the issue of fair use and have come to the conclusion neither images are justified under fair use. As such, I have also put the other image up for review at Fair use review Nil Einne 12:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Graphamir.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Graphamir.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Novels WikiProject Newsletter July 2006
Here is the new edition of our monthly newsletter. The July 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  14:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Template:Title
Hi. Template:Title is up for TFD and has an overwhelming consensus to delete. Because of this, I've recreated Template:Title at User:SushiGeek/Title. I've fixed this for you on your user and user talk page. SushiGeek 14:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Junoon
A user keeps adding a link to the article on 'junoon' on wiki, and I have removed it alot of times, only to find it coming back. Apparently hes posting an interview on some site called 'raw.com.pk' which has nothing to do with the band, and is not endorsed by the band management.

More clarification of Junoon Article
Ali Azmat, a band member of that group never gave that interview, it has absolutely baseless information, and was probably written off by someone else (other than Ali Azmat, the leading vocalist of the band), and he states that the band is 'no more' in that interview, which is wrong information. Any can just about post a false interview to promote his/her website, so it was our duty to point that out i.e. the interview being false, I hope you remove those external links to raw.com.pk.

Regarding A RFA
Sfacets, for your information, there is an RFA Evidence Page involving Andries. SSS108 talk-email 06:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Qawalli comedic short film
Just curious why you deleted the links from the NFAK page but left one in on the qawwali page... --Sarabseth 11:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

The links were mass-posted to various articles (close to 10 articles) sometimes twice on one article... A bungled attempt at promoting the videos on Youtube. Must have missed the one on the Qawwali article... Sfacets 11:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)


 * But did you check the link to see if the content was what it claimed to be? If so, it's surely relevant to the NFAK and Qawwali pages, and we should leave in one link on both pages, I think.  (I have a dial-up connection, so I'm not going to even try to check the content.) --Sarabseth 01:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes I did check... it appears to be a low-budget amateur parody of Mast Qalandar... "Mast Aloo" by some kids... not terribly relevant. Sfacets 01:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting problem
Hey, I voted for the Nagpur article, but instead of showing up as no.2, my name is showing up as no.1, and I had to manually change the number of votes to 2. Is this how it always works? --Wikindian 16:57, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Never mind.--Wikindian 16:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Need your support
Hey, You have been quite active in editing the Nagpur article. So, go to the discussion page and give your support for nominating Nagpur for the Indian collaboration for this week. --Wikindian 22:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Rajneesh - why did you revert?
Hi Sfacets,

I don't understand why you reverted my removal of the article copied into Rajneesh. Pls see Talk:Rajneesh --Singkong2005 talk 01:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. --Singkong2005 talk 04:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Copyrighted Material at SRCM and Sahaj Marg Articles
Hi there Sfacets,

Thanks for your help. About copyright corrections to articles:

1. To let you know about a fast revert: your removal of copyrighted material from SRCM article your change has been reverted and original content replaced by User 4d-Don.

DIFF: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shri_Ram_Chandra_Mission&diff=64875991&oldid=64804996

2. About removal of copyrighted material from Sahaj Marg article, you explained at article talk page:

"As well as being unencyclopedic, this section was mostly, if not in it's entirety comprised of copyrighted content from http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Sahaj_Marg Sfacets 06:35, 20 July 2006 (UTC)"

A. Copyright: FYI, the material is NOT copyrighted to http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Sahaj_Marg or any website which has since picked up quotes from my two Yoga International articles (who had only the usual First North American Serial Rights, and copyright reverted after publcation to me) BTW, I found nothing at the page now that you quoted - but did find the YI articles reprinted here (like the others, without my permission but NP, I do not mind) .... I am also the author the book A Sahaj Marg Companion: The Natural Path and cited the sources and sincerely thought that fair use and this applied.

B. Unencyclopedic About its "being unencyclopedic," again who's to say for sure what this means. Given the disputes I found going on, I wanted to cite sources. I thought it presented facts and info quickly in a readable fashion, and furthermore this presentation was, unlike other content, personally approved by the President of SRCM.

But I see now there is some gray area and so perhaps I was wrong. Right or wrong, I leave to administrators and will now withdraw from further input at Wikipedia.

--Sakha 17:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

To Sfacets from 4d-don
Hi Sfacets....

Clark Powell AKA CP-Sacha is not accurate as usual on his above statement about me. I paraphrased the section in question as per Wikipedia Policy and then posted it. If you think it needs more let me know and I will acquiesce.

Clark had his own site called "invertendo.com" which was forced to close by the Guru, Chari and he is now trying to use Wikipedia to "proselytize" and please the Guru and get back in his facour as he is now heading off to India. We who are regulars to the site and are trying to make it an encyclopedia rather than a PR site for "the Mission" have has continuous edit battles with him. I will be here to work with all who want to make sure that the truth survives on this part of WIKI....

Thanks for your input again....I have protected the last info you gave me....

don

Articles for deletion/Yogani
There are over a hundred AFD's a day. If every one of them contained the full text of all the deletion guidelines the daily log would run gigabytes. Simply post a link to WP:NOT and specify the specific entries it violates. We do not need the full policies reposted in the AFD. Fan-1967 01:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Article on Salman Ahmad
Hello Sfacets, this is in reference to the wiki article on 'salman ahmad', this tabloid site raw.com.pk keeps posting their links, and that particular link they posted is about a band called 'vital signs', and is accusing them of being 'copy cats', just part of a groupie (from another band called mizraab, posting with alias rameez) personal hate mongering campaign against the band.

Firstly, the article from raw.com.pk has nothing to do with the band Junoon or Salman Ahmad, and is rather biased, and according the wikipedia rules, biased links, which have nothing to do with the subject at hand, and is a mere attempt for them to get hits on their site. I request you to read that article. It does not even mention 'salman ahmad', so why does it need to be there in the first place? You will find its very biased, which is why it is not coming from an unauthentic news site, which is 'hardly' credible.

Thanks

Rosser
I see that someone who says she is Yvette Rosser, previously known to me only from a deletion debate some time ago, recently got in touch with you about a closed AfD, which you naturally told her to take to deletion review. This is the long message that Ms. Rosser left for me on my talk page: ; my response is here. I thought you might like to be kept informed. It was a little startling to see it, as you can imagine. Nevertheless, I hope she (if it is her) finds her way round WP soon and starts to make her own edits so she understands the procedure better. Hornplease 03:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Novels WikiProject Newsletter August 2006
Here is the new edition of our monthly newsletter. The August 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  11:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Swami Ramdev
I noticed you edited the Swami Ramdev page. Thanks for editing it with an actual username. Most IP's are good, but looking at a list of edits I can't really trust gets annoying. Its good to know that you take the time to sift through all the IP edits.Bakaman <sub style="color:blue;">Bakatalk 23:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the photo.Bakaman <sub style="color:blue;">Bakatalk 15:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

spamlink added to New_age External links
I thought it'd be useful. I'll get the owner to put his articles in a more useful form. He's considered an authority in Yorkshire UK, but isn't that well known,

Sorry if it looked like a spam link, I'll try to do better next time glenn

Damages done on Mother's Pages
Dear Sir

I am living with AMMA since 1997 in Amritapuri, the native village of AMMA.

I am also working as an Asst. Professor in Amrita University inspired and emerged out by AMMA's blessings.

I find too much of filth being added to AMMA's pages here ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mata_Amritanandamayi

and all the contribution that I do, are getting damaged by the users who do not have any knowledge of the Great Mother.

This is a terrible mistake. We shall have to pay for that if not done without proper care and concern.

Yours sridhar

Dear Sridhar,

The article you mention is NOT AMMA's article, rather is an encyclopedic article on Amritanandamayi and her organisation. For that reason is is important, no, essential to maintain neutral and unbiased content so that each and everyone can gather information without being persuaded one way or another.

Please keep this in mind for your future edits. Sfacets 05:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

First know who AMMA really is ...
Dear Sir

First you should personally meet AMMA and know who She really is and do the Wiki contribution.

Otherwise, you will end up with a terrible mistake that shall bring in untold problem because of your own ignorance and because of lunatics who dare comment on such a Great Mother.

I must pray that such rascals must be bansihed off.

May the Divine Mother bless us all with right understanding.

Yours truly

sridhar

Dear Sridhar,

It doesn't matter who Amma is. The simple fact of it is that this website is not here to promote her. Full stop. There are plenty of forums on the web full of eager young minds just waiting for your words of wisdom.

All the best, Sfacets 09:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

New Peterklutz sockpuppet?
Peterklutz may be back violating his indefinite block and resuming his edit wars over the Transcendental Meditation, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, and Yogic Flying artoc;es. He may using the sockpuppet name Peterjoe. Bishonen, who has been policing his repeated sockpuppet violations, is out of the country until next week, so perhaps you can check this out and issue a block if appropriate?Askolnick 04:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Sahaj Marg Cleanup
Hi Sfacets...

In Sahaj Marg, the "Teachings from the Sahaj Marg Material" is like discussing the "Bible", one has to quote it word for word. I paraphrased the rest of the material. If I paraphrase this section, the heading is not correct and could be discussed ad nauseum by abhyasis who will claim that I am "interpreting"...and without authority as I am not "one of them", so cannot understand it properly. Quotes seems to be the only way to go!!!

I will make headings for that section. What do you suggest? Should I paraphrase anyway and get into the "edit wars". Most have already accepted that the "words of the Master" are fair game much as the words of Christ are fair game when discussing the Bible....

Thanks for your suggestions and input...

don

Hi again...(this is Don)

I replaced two of the English External links that you had taken out. If there is a problem let me know why?? I understand for the "french" ones. The "Poxy SRCM" and the "Desperate Abhyasis" are in English. I did not place mine (4d-don) in there. It was "Clark" who put it in because to him I was trying to "hide". I will not include it for obvious reasons....

Did you want those quotes "encapsulated" like that?

Thanks for the input...

Don...

Swami Ramdev - copyright violation
Greetings ! I am writing in reference to a Copyright violation posting on the Swami Ramdev page. - If you originated this concern then this information may help shed light as to why there is NOT an issue and - If you did not post the copyright concern, perhaps, you can direct me to the appropriate person/process for resolution.

ITEMS: - I read the article on http://www.marsh.in/html/yoga/yoga.htm. Referencing the paras in this article Starting - " In 1995, Swamiji...." and Ending -  "...without the use of any medicines "

You can notice that the content is picked up mostly verbatim from the section SWAMI of the page on Wiki. The external article also states that its source is the Baba Ramdev article on Wikipedia among others

- Most of the content of the section SWAMI on Wiki was posted by me as original material based on info received from Swamiji's Divvya Yoga personnel. Over time this content was edited and modified to its current form

CONCLUSION: - If the copyright concern stems from the SWAMI section then I believe its a non-issue FOLLOW-UP: - Am not very familiar with Wiki, so let me know as a next step what needs to happen

Thanks and Best Regards,

Wikipost


 * About this, could you specify a bit more of your feelings on the copy issue? I asked Wikipost to rewrite the section so that it does not violate it. Would you also support a rewrite? (reply on my talk page or Swami Ramdev talk)Bakaman <sub style="color:blue;">Bakatalk 03:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I see. I will ask him to re-write so that there is no plagiarism.Bakaman <sub style="color:blue;">Bakatalk 14:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I am working on rewrite. Do you support semiprotection so IP cant vandalize the page? Bakaman <sub style="color:blue;">Bakatalk 19:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

I think semiprotection is overkill in this case... we can deal with the IP vandalism as they crop up... if it gets worse I'll support. Sfacets 16:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Sahaja
Yes, I see you have added new material in your second edit. But you should cite it as you add it. Presumably you are getting the information from somewhere. It is not fair for you to add material and then ask others to source and cite it for you. Thus, if you proceed correctly and not add information without sourcing and citing it, there would be no need for a tag!! I will give you a bit to go back and correct this, but am likely to simply remove to the talk page as "awaiting sources" rather than leave the tag on the article. &mdash;Hanuman Das 18:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Rajneesh
Hi Sfacets, I found your post(see below)about:"Rajneesh". I like to know, if you have seen Rajneesh by yourself? Have you read any book or have you listen to any discourse by Rajneesh? My impression is, that your posting is more about opinions not no about facts. Please comment

Michael, Germany, Freiburg

''Friends, I urge everyone here to go through the book "The Perfect Matrimony" and the teachings on the page http://www.gnosis-usa.com http://www.gnosiscentral.com/englishbooks/Perfect_Matrimony.pdf also the books available here: http://www.americangnosticassociation.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=67&Itemid=4 Rajneesh was a Black Magician. A wolf in sheep's coating. 202.83.32.153 07:35, 30 June 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the spam. Sfacets 00:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)''

(Answered on user's talkpage)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV (September 2006)
The September 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 11:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Bhagwan Swaminarayan Article
How can you say it has fallen victim to the Kalupur agenda?

Please research the history of the sect then comment. Kalapur was the first swaminarayan temple. The Kalapur/Vadtal division of administration in the system of administrating the sect implemented by Swami Swaminarayan.

New age article mass reverts by FieryPhoenix
Hello to you in the "land down under". It's late here in the USA. Just wanted to point out that the talk page for the article on New age (Talk:New Age) has an explanation of why I reverted the mass edits by new User:FieryPhoenix. Take care. ... Kenosis 04:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother
Hi, Sfacets. According to this page, you are a member of the Big Brother WikiProject. It would appear, perhaps because Big Brother isn't airing in Australia, the United Kingdom, or the United States at the moment, that activity on Big Brother-related articles has died down quite a bit. Between seasons is a good time to be editing Big Brother-related articles as this is probably the only time where Wikipedians can focus on the articles that seem to have been forgotten about without too many Big Brother-related distractions. There are a few articles just waiting to be worked on, and proposed article changes on the Project talk page that have received little feedback. Nobody is forced to do anything as a Project member, but please try to edit whatever Big Brother articles you can and help with the WikiProject's aim - to make the Big Brother articles the best that they can be! Thanks. jd || talk || 20:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 20:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Sahaj Marg Site
Hi Sfacets...

You left two templates on the Sahaj Marg site. One I could deal with, the "references" was not complete so I am starting to reference all the material as much as possible. The "Formal Tone" of the writing not be "encyclopedic"...What does that mean? I Paraphrased as per your request to remove the "direct quotes"....For me to write in a "different tone", you would have to point out in specifics what you mean, without beginning an "edit war". Things have been quiet there and I can make the changes you want if I can be "guided"....

Please reply so I can remove the template and adjust the site to your "standard".

4d-don...

=Raja Yoga controversy= Dear Hinduism Project editors,

There is a controversy on the Hinduism regarding Raja Yoga. Please read the debate on the Hinduism discussion page. Your comments are requested on the Hinduism discussion page to help resolve the controversy. Thank you. HeBhagawan 15:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Ohm
There is nothing about in the talk page, and it has no archives. If you don't believe me Google it. Psychomelodic 01:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * See the "Trance?" section on the talk page. Ohm is the symbol for electiric impedance. Aum is a Hinduism-related symbol. Sfacets 02:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I did not mention anything about trance or electricity. Ohm is another way to write Aum (the Hinduism-related symbol) in the Latin alphabet, similar to Om. The phrase "Ohm" does not appear on Talk:Aum at all. See also Ohm at Google Images. Psychomelodic 05:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

See Sahaja Yoga International AFD
For info, see Articles for deletion/Sahaja Yoga International Paul foord 13:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Sahaj Marg / Shri Ram Chandr Mission NPOV
Hi there, I've noticed that you're very involved in Wikipedia. Kudos! I've been involved for more than a year, mostly doing minor grammatical corrections, but I wrote some of the material for the Sahaj Marg article, back in September of 2005. I'd like to know what you think of the post I added to the discussion pages of these articles: Sahaj Marg and Shri Ram Chandra Mission, as I noticed that you've posted there, and you seem familiar with the topic and Wikipedia in general.

I'd like to collaborate with you, 4d-don and cp-sakha on getting a NPOV approved version of the article up and running. Also, do you know: is there a governing board that makes the POV notice decision? When the next incarnation of the article is posted, who makes the decision to take the POV notice down?

Thanks, MatheoDJ 2006-10-16 10:37 (UTC)

=SYI= Please, cease with the personal attacks at Articles for deletion/Sahaja Yoga International, as they are not helping your case. For example, your accusation that I have been removing valid sources from the article.

Considering the quantity of articles that you have dealt with on Wikipedia, I am actually surprised by your recent behavior. The information on your userpage implies that you have extensive experience with Wikipedia and with fighting vandalism. Yet your behavior as regards SYI has been in violation of Wikipedia policies, such as WP:V. Have you re-read it recently? Especially the part that says that any unsourced information can be removed from Wikipedia at any time, by any editor? Also, I think that you are confused about the purpose of an AfD discussion. It is not a competition or a vote, it is not about "winning" or "losing", it is about having a civil and good faith discussion between editors in order to determine a proper course of action. I still genuinely believe that the best course of action is to merge the SYI article into the Sahaja Yoga article. Why are you so against this? It would not mean anything negative about SYI, and all sourced information would still be on Wikipedia -- it would simply be merging information from two articles, into one article. I am confused as to your strong opposition to this, can you please assume good faith, and explain? --NovaSTL 09:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I have read it. And as you say any unsourced information can be removed from Wikipedia at any time, by any editor. You removed sources from the article. How can their be a premise of good faith when there is an inequality setup from the beginning stemming from the fact that you do not divulge your main account name?

In what way was I violating Wiki policy?

You say that you genuinely believe that the best course of action is to merge the two articles, and yet your edits belie this, such as when you make edits that have nothing to do with merging the two articles, and give all appearances of nitpicking - such as flagging the logo image.

Why am I against merging the two aricles? Sahaja Yoga is two things, has always been two things, and there is a large separation between Sahaja Yoga, a form of meditation from the Shakta tradition, and Sahaja Yoga the organisation, which is an actual organisation in many countries, which coordinates, and manages both the spread of the message behind Sahaja Yoga, as well as offshoots of this message, such as NGO activities, Medical research, music and art.

I know you just want to merge the two articles, and I want to assume good faith, so long as you can stick to facts (calling Sahaja Yoga a cult shows POV) and to the task at hand, which is determining wether or not the article will remain. Sfacets 20:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Vndlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Vndlogo.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NovaSTL 18:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The image in question is tagged as being a logo, and therefore considered fair use. Sfacets 20:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually there's a confusion on the image page. The uploader (you) has said that the source is unknown. First off, the sources for all Fair Use images must be listed. Second, it has also been tagged as "Attribution ShareAlike License v. 2.5:" with the creator being "Sfacets". How can "Sfacets" be the creator if the source is unknown? If we can find a fresh copy of the logo, whose source is known, then we can have a legitimate Fair Use claim for it. -Will Beback 21:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

= Help! Redirect Vandalism =

Hi SFcets...

Someone has re-directed my talk page on the Sahaj Marg site. They also got rid of the Sahaj Marg Talk page "archives". Could you assist in reversing that vandalism or ??...My Sahaj Marg talk page is re-directed to "Shri Ram Chandra Mission" talk page. I happened a while ago and I did not notice.

Leave me a message on the Shri Ram Chandra Mission Discussion page if I can be of assistance or when you have done the "reversal" and correction.

Thanks for you assistance....

4d-don

I did not vandalize.
I was warned for vandalism, however, I did not vandalize. Please remove from your "black" list.

Thanks.

216.106.126.195 17:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)disgruntled user

User:Sfacets/Sahaja Yoga International
restored to a subpage for ya -- Tawker 23:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks mate. Sfacets 11:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Pattabhi Jois
Hi. I noticed you added some tags to this article. I'm trying to improve the article; would you care to discuss in the article talk how we can do this? Cheers --Guinnog 22:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for catching the vandalism in the article on Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. TimidGuy 15:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

No worries... I've been keeping an eye on the article for some time now - looks a lot better than it did (less POV for one). Good work! Sfacets 11:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

ThanksTimidGuy 12:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Afd and newer version
Kindly take a look at Buddhism and Hinduism. I also nominated Buddhadharma and other Indian Dharmas for deletion. Please take a look into that article as well, Best regards and Cheers. Freedom skies 23:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I think it would be a good idea to nominate Buddhadharma and other Indian Dharmas for deletion because 1)Connotes inequality between the two 2)Contains original research and 3)Most of it's contents can be found in related articles.

I noticed that you placed instead of  however.

Sfacets 11:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)