User talk:Sfiller

Paine
Paine is the first one to use the term "Nigger Jim," in a literary context.

Seeing as how critic Russell Baker was born in 1925, a year after Paine's last biography of Twain came out, to use the phrase, "Baker's basis for attributing "Nigger Jim" as an epithet to Twain is unknown," is a falsity. Whether Baker directly read Twain's biography or not (though the fact that he is a critic/columnist indicates he would have at some point), his writing still took place long after the book came out which means he either took the phrase from Paine or from another critic who took it from Paine. His basis is not, therefore, "unknown."

Also, Wikipedia is a site which tries to be encyclopedic, yet a listing of where the words "Nigger," and "Jim," are together a) constitutes original research on your part which is a Wiki no-no (the research being the fact that though you and I can see where he did not put the terms together, no accredited professional has done so in one paper) and b) combined with the listing of critics such as Mailer and Fiedler, but not every critic who's ever used the term comes off as biased against those prominent writers, and reads more like (and this is not an ACCUSation, only an OBSERVation) an angry African-American person breaking the text down to educate ignorant "whitey."

Sfiller says: I don't quite get this ancient things except to note that they forced me to back off the interesting observation that a mass delusion persisted, and was content to note that the use of the term "Nigger Jim," which has no basis in the novel ADVENTURES OF HUCKLEBERRY FINN, seems to have started with an influential 1912 biography that uses the term, and this is the best explanation of a visible phenomenon manifested in this Wikipedia article in the form of the Baker quotation, inserted wisely by someone, to good to remove, but misleading in that someone might read it and suppose that "Nigger Jim" is a character in the novel, whereas the term is all wrong for the leading character, who is introduced at the beginning of the novel as an artist who's fame has made him all but unfit to be a servant; i.e., set apart from all the other slaves. It is not a case of my originality but of correcting for disinformation. Finding Payne was a piece of luck from other people's research, and a look at the biography makes it clear that it had to be influential. The comment--if it remains there in 2010--refrains, with effort, from speculation; e.g., as to why leading U.S. critics used this strange term, more evocative of Contrad than Twain, over decades. If someone could show that Clemens himself used it despite the changes in his views, it would still be misleading in an article cognizant of, if not absorbed in, the novel's remarkable and persistent success. Stuart Filler (talk) 02:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Gnrlotto 06:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey Stu
Lots of changes to Vincent Chin, lots more to come. You might want to add some references to the Louis Filler article.MMetro (talk) 13:54, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Correcting the name of P.H.H.P.
Stuart, I'm Tom Padilla, Martha's son. I checked with my mom and the name of the P.H.H.P. article is wrong. The problem is, Bevens got it wrong in his article... over and over and over again. Since WP needs citations to make changes and we don't have a citation for the correct name the best course of action is for you (a member of the commitee) to contact them and ask for the name to be corrected. Go to the page for Contact_us/Article_problem/Factual_error_(from_subject) and near the bottom is a list of things to put in the email (the exact article link and the specific problem). Let me know if you need any help with any part of this (you can just reply right on this page, I'll be watching). Padillah (talk) 13:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

A Canticle for Leibowitz copyright vs publication date
Sfiller, I saw your note on the year change for ACfL. What information do you have about the actual publication date? My understanding is that it was copyrighted in 1959, but publication didn't occur until the following year. This would fit in with the Hugo Award occurring in 1961 (Starship Troopers, for example was published in December 1959, but received the 1960 Hugo). Interested in anything you've got. Thanks. Jim Dunning | talk  06:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bamako (film) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWXhCJ4pJmw (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ousmane Sembène, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bush Mama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Burnett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 19 October 2013 (UTC)