User talk:Sfynx301

June 2015
Hello, I'm Amaury. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Genocides in history— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 03:32, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Amaury, I have reverted your change, as I find it is not constructive. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Shaka#Disruptions_of_the_Mfecane. Having a Zulu section Under Genocide is an outright lie.

Thank you

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Genocides in history with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 04:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Amaury, please advise how removing an outright lie from Wikipedia is nonconstructive? Please advise how my edits appear to constitute vandalism?

Thanks

Sfynx301 (talk) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- BullRangifer (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC)