User talk:Sgaladima

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  MrOllie (talk) 16:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Working capital ‎. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kuru  (talk)  21:01, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to REL Consultancy has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Barts1a (talk) 09:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

I have declined your request for speedy deletion of REL Consultancy, as the reason given is not a valid one for speedy deletion. You should also note that "REL is willing to see that page definitively deleted" is irrelevant, as REL does not own the article. Once an article has been created it is released for public use, and neither the subject of the article nor the creator of the article has the right to decide that it should go, nor indeed any more rights over it than any other Wikipedia editor. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of REL Consultancy


The article REL Consultancy has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Has only primary sources, tagged for that and "advert" for over a year. Notability not demonstrated

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fayenatic (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)