User talk:Sgbpryan

Reference spamming
I reverted two of your edits because they seemed to be reference spamming. For more information, you may wish to read Wikipedia's guideline on citing yourself.  Tera TIX  08:16, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm new to this but as far as I can tell there's nothing problematic about my edits. The reference provided for the libertarian paternalism edit was to my article in a highly respected philosophy journal precisely on the topic of libertarian paternalism. My other edit for the wisdom entry in the "Philosophical perspectives" section provided background to the contemporary philosophical discussion of wisdom. This is something that is currently absent from that section. Citations were provided to academic articles that have appeared in a respected peer reviewed journal. Sgbpryan (talk) 08:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I have undone my reverts for now and started a discussion at Talk:Wisdom.  Tera TIX  13:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)