User talk:Sgelman55

March 2013
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  STATic  message me!  00:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to User talk:STATicVerseatide. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.  STATic  message me!  20:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Greetings! A couple of things. First, I'm an admin, and STATicVerseatide's user talk page is on my watchlist, so I saw the message you left him. The message just above that he left you is a template, a standardized message for situations like the above. There's not a custom version for when the warner is also the offended party; that's why it's in the third person. The standard warnings are useful because it makes sure that consistent messages are given and that the tone stays neutral. —C.Fred (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2013 (UTC)