User talk:Sgf5v

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Regancy42 (talk) 13:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Regancy42 (talk) 13:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Chaconaut for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Regancy42 (talk) 13:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to add spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ mazca  talk 13:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC) If you are at Wikipedia only to promote your web site, you are a spammer regardless of the merits of that web site. If unblocked, what other kinds of edits would you be making? A person who is knowledgeable about archeology might be a very useful editor, but if this site truly is the best source of information, it is inevitable that people will cite it when adding information to the article- there's no need for people associated with the web site to add it as a link. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC) I'm sorry. I did not mean to make two separate requests. I just thought I needed to follow the same format to respond. As I said below, I meant no harm in adding links to these pages but simply wanted to provide access to related information for those interested in pursuing more research on the topics. I will not add external links again. If unblocked, I will only edit content and potentially add the website as a reference where it is required. I'm very sorry that this caused a problem. Thank you for considering my request. (Sgf5v (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC))
 * Unblocking you now. Your edits to content and referencing are welcome, so as long as you don't resume just placing links to an external site there will be no further problems. Thanks in advance. ~ mazca  talk15:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)