User talk:Sgilbreath/sandbox

Instructor feedback for article draft
This is a good start overall. However, I think there will need to be much more content added to make a stronger contribution to the original article. For example, if you were writing a new Wiki article, the guidelines recommend no more than 2,400 words. Your draft is about 420 words, so there needs to be more. It seems like the original article lacks information related to close relationships. How has URT been utilized and evolved in close relationship research? What are the recent applications of URT in close relationship research?

In the "employees and employers" section you provide a nice summary of a research article. However, I feel like there could be more connection to the broader section of job hiring and URT theorizing in general.

The last sentence of the online education paragraph could be expanded with an example and more explanation of how this idea connects to uncertainty reduction.

The online commerce section is interesting, but it is pretty far afield from relational communication. I'm not sure how this advances understanding about relational communication through the theoretical lens of URT. I recommend making a clearer connection or removing this section.

Remember to use proper APA style throughout including in-text citation format and reference section. Most of the citations in the reference section are in incorrect style and are missing information. It is difficult to determine if these sources are peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles or not. Jrpederson (talk) 03:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)