User talk:ShaaziaE

Petition Reform

Welcome!
Hello, ShaaziaE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! OnionRing (talk) 08:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Petition Reform
Hello ShaaziaE,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Petition Reform for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 08:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I have rewritten the page to a redirect. Xx236 (talk) 09:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Petition Bylaw Reform in the City of Johannesburg
Hi, I'm 220 of Borg. ShaaziaE, thanks for creating Petition Bylaw Reform in the City of Johannesburg!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Requires sources for verifiability and to establish wp:Notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. 220  of  Borg 09:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, ShaaziaE. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Petition Bylaw Reform in the City of Johannesburg, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Little Will (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Petition Bylaw Reform in the City of Johannesburg


The article Petition Bylaw Reform in the City of Johannesburg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:SOAP. Wikipedia is not a platform for political initiatives."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 13:29, 13 July 2021 (UTC)