User talk:Shadow6322

Welcome!
Hello, Shadow6322, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- BullRangifer (talk) 22:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to MMR vaccine controversy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: MMR vaccine controversy was changed by Shadow6322 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975334 on 2015-08-25T21:12:47+00:00.

MMR and Autism
You have an interesting opinion about autism and the MMR vaccine controversy‎, but it's not original, new, or based on any reliable evidence. Your speculations have been removed because they are not based on any reliable sources (RS). They are just personal opinions and original research (OR). Please don't add such content again. Your vandalism was also reverted.

Instead, read the series of articles related to the subject, and then change your mind and align your opinions to fit with the content in those articles. Why is that the wisest course? Because what's written in them is based on the most RS available. The content is not based on any editor's opinions or controlled by Big Pharma, and the content is created through the collaborative efforts of myriad editors of all persuasions and opposing POV, including yours, but those personal POV have no influence on the end product. The end product is a summation of all the best evidence available. If the evidence changes, then the articles will also change to reflect what the best evidence says, so you will always be up-to-date and your opinions will be informed by evidence, not by the speculations and conspiracy theories found on the internet.

Here are the best articles to start with:


 * Vaccine controversies
 * MMR vaccine controversy
 * Andrew Wakefield
 * Thiomersal controversy
 * Autism
 * Alternative vaccination schedule
 * Category:MMR vaccine controversy

I wish you well here. If you need any help or advice, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. I'm going to place a welcome template above which has lots of links to information. Study those links. If you understand our policies and guidelines, you will lessen your chances of getting into trouble and getting blocked. -- BullRangifer (talk) 22:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It was vandalism. Might be time to IP block this person. Damotclese (talk) 16:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)