User talk:Shadowguy76

Fair use rationale for Image:Miseria Logo7rev1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Miseria Logo7rev1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Miseria
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Miseria, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Miseria
An editor has nominated Miseria, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * you couldn't possibly be suggesting that being on myspace, and snocap have any significance, are you? I can record myself belching into a microphone and put it on myspace and sell it on snocap. How about some reliable secondary sources? As per the guidelines you claim to have read? - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 08:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

if you want to find the sources go on google and look, its not difficult, and we aren't the ones who came up with the article one of our fans did and just told us what was going on so we stepped in, there is no conflict of interest with that. and my mistake, it's stretchtheskies.com. then there's the web interview we did located at http://www.ilovemusicibuymusic.org/?page_id=902. In regards to the newspapers, they are local papers that cover mainly world events, you can attempt to search for us on their websites but other than that they are only on hard copies. there will be another article released within the next couple of weeks by the monterey county herald which will be published online because it deals with the music scene in the city. do you want to us to have the articles posted on the page to prove it? as far as the newspaper in santa cruz just go to their website and see if it's still online, we had our big santa cruz show last july at the catalyst and the venue's website along with the santa cruz herald always announces what's going on.

Shadowguy76 (talk) 19:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

and another thing, i am suggesting they have amazing significance; snocap is one of the largest online music retailers on the planet next to amazon.com, itunes.com, and smartpunk.com, many artists of many styles sell their music on all of these sites. as far as myspace goes how could it not be significant considering it's the biggest advertising and networking tool in the world, it blows facebook, xanga, and everything else out of the water and you would have to be ignorant to not see it's significance.

Shadowguy76 (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

End of Times EP (Miseria demo)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article End of Times EP (Miseria demo), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of End of Times EP (Miseria demo).  tomasz.  17:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

With Pressure Rising (Miseria album)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article With Pressure Rising (Miseria album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of With Pressure Rising (Miseria album).  tomasz.  17:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:EndofTimes(new)edit.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:EndofTimes(new)edit.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 19:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Miseria Logo7edit.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Miseria Logo7edit.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Miseria Logo7.jpg


The file File:Miseria Logo7.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:04, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Topbanneredit2.jpg


The file File:Topbanneredit2.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:04, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Topbanneredit.jpg


The file File:Topbanneredit.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:04, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:WPR100edit.jpg


The file File:WPR100edit.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)