User talk:Shaggybucket

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Rockpock e  t  09:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Charlotte Laws
Hi, and thanks for your message. Congratulations on your first article. Its very good indeed for a first attempt, well done. Thanks also for providing those references, its usually good to have biographies of living people well sourced for reasons of libel etc.

Regarding the red link to omniocracy. That is not a request for you to make the article, per se. Its just an interesting word/concept that I think might benefit from its own article one day. Don't feel you have to turn red links blue, but of course, if you want to then it would be most helpful. Welcome, once again, to Wikipedia and happy editing! Rockpock e  t  09:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia
I am curious why you took out my edit on Jan 31st. I thought this was information people would want to know - how Microsoft is paying a third party to put the company in a favorable light on Wikipedia. I was about to add a footnote for my change, but you deleted it before I could. Thanks.


 * The Microsoft incident can hardly be termed "In popular culture". It would be better off mentioned in Reliability of Wikipedia, and possibly also in Criticism of Wikipedia if you can find a source for criticism following the event. It's not really significant enough for the main Wikipedia article, which in in the middle of a major rewrite and has been trimmed down substantially. Things like the Seigenthaler incident get a mention in the main article – Qxz 20:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I've rewritten the "Criticism and controversy" section and it now includes a brief mention of the incident. More detailed information in one of the other articles mentioned above is welcome – Qxz 12:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Charlotte Laws beige jacket 1.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charlotte Laws beige jacket 1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC) --Hammersoft (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Claims that Rachlf is a vandal
You can give this user warnings by using templates from this page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace). If this user ignores the warning level 4, then you can report this user.Chanhee920 (talk) 21:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)