User talk:Shagil Kannur

Speedy deletion nomination of Jawahar Rozgar Yojana


A tag has been placed on Jawahar Rozgar Yojana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JMHamo (talk) 15:55, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Rural Employment Programme(NREP)
Hello ഷഗിൽ കണ്ണൂർ,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged National Rural Employment Programme(NREP) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Cotton2 (talk) 17:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Rural Employment Programme NREP


A tag has been placed on National Rural Employment Programme NREP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.teindia.nic.in/mhrd/50yrsedu/15/8P/84/8P840203.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hitro  talk  13:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:ഷഗിൽ കണ്ണൂർ/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:%E0%B4%B7%E0%B4%97%E0%B4%BF%E0%B5%BD_%E0%B4%95%E0%B4%A3%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%A3%E0%B5%82%E0%B5%BC/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abdullah_Alam&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:%E0%B4%B7%E0%B4%97%E0%B4%BF%E0%B5%BD_%E0%B4%95%E0%B4%A3%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%A3%E0%B5%82%E0%B5%BC/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 08:53, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Kerala Fire and Rescue Services Academy. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

SomeImage.jpg

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your corrections. Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Shagil Kannur/sandbox


Hello, Shagil Kannur. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Vijoo Krishnan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijoo Krishnan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vijoo Krishnan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Hey there Shagil Kannur. This article was nominated for deletion because it is in a poor state.  The editor who nominated it did so because, as it stands, it does not meet the guidelines.  They have given you an opportunity to fix it and save it. If you want to keep this page you will have to make a better argument than you have.  You are able to edit and improve the article, and you should do it.  I have found articles in the The Hindu Times that mention Vijoo Krishnan.  He has been an activist for a long time.  I think he is notable; I am working on improvements and will mount an argument to keep it if I find enough sources to make him notable.  Take a read of Notability (people) and Notability to make yourself aware of the guidelines and rules relating to Biographies of living persons, it will help you to mount a better argument.  If I can find material with 10 minutes on Google from Australia, you should be able to find a lot more from your home in India.  Good luck! 8&#61;&#61;8 Boneso (talk) 04:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Communist Party of India (Marxist) ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Communist_Party_of_India_%28Marxist%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Communist_Party_of_India_%28Marxist%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Mohammed Salim, Mahendra Singh, Jaswinder Singh and Arun Kumar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Your Gwalior Fort photo
Your photo is already in the gallery at Gwalior Fort. The Gwalior article already has 6 photos of it - I don't think another one is needed and you don't need to add yours repeatedly. Batternut (talk) 09:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vijoo Krishnan


Hello, Shagil Kannur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vijoo Krishnan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)