User talk:Shahidaasi

Welcome!
Hello, Shahidaasi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Saeed Aasi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BiH (talk) 07:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Saeed Aasi


The article Saeed Aasi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. BiH (talk) 07:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saeed Aasi


A tag has been placed on Saeed Aasi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justice007 (talk) 12:03, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Saeed Aasi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saeed Aasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Saeed Aasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justice007 (talk) 15:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Saeed Aasi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I Notify Online 14:38, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

 * Please do not teach me, you are breaching the wiki-rules, some times as IP addresses and sometimes sock puppetry, you are adding the WP:Original research and WP:Promotional content without citing WP:Reliable sources. What you are providing links of Youtube, daily Motion, and subject's own website that are not the reliable sources. I warn you, stop adding original research content to Saeed Aasi, if you remain reverting good faith edits, you will be blocked from editing. I hope this helps.Justice007 (talk) 14:40, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Saeed Aasi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ron h jones (Talk) 17:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Please review this administrative action. This may be WP:BYTE.  "Vandalism" has a specific meaning on Wikipedia, and content contributions are not vandalism.  Although it appears that requesting contact information may violate WP:TPG, the request for the purpose of providing evidence hardly seems to be justify a characterization as "threatening".  I present those two points as specific flaws in the request that resulted in this block.  Further, the initiator is editing an article he/she has nominated for deletion.  IMO the removal of material and references is questionable from an article he/she presumably believes to be worthless and will soon be deleted.  Furthermore, the content contributor here may be an experienced writer with a knowledge of Urdu and access to sources on many topics that remain uncovered on the English Wikipedia.  Thank you, Unscintillating (talk) 00:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I never said vandalism. This was a straightforward violation of WP:3RR - the edit summaries on the history page shown 3 clear "Undid revision", plus one edit of content removal all within a couple of hours. Creating articles directly (rather than using articles for creation) is always very difficult (if not impossible sometimes!) and one has to be confident of the requirements of the policies to do that. Ron h jones (Talk) 19:42, 18 September 2014 (UTC)