User talk:Shahs227

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 14:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Hello, I'm Jojhutton. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Kluger Agency without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JOJ Hutton  14:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Kluger Agency, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 15:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Your sole purpose here as a single purpose account (along with your aliases and several anonymous IPs) seems to be removing anything negative about the organization with which you are affiliated, The Kluger Agency. That fact, and your refusal to discuss your removal of sourced information, is entirely unacceptable on Wikipedia. There are now many eyes on the article because of your abuse of editing privileges. If you continue this pattern, you will be blocked from editing. If you think something in the article needs to be changed, in the future you must first request the change on the article's talk page and let other editors make appropriate changes. Cresix (talk) 23:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CharlieEchoTango ( contact ) 01:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/keywordrenewals for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 15:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)