User talk:Shaiguitar

July 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Concurrency (computer science) has been reverted. Your edit here to Concurrency (computer science) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlkXhpktX0E) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Concurrent computing, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Concurrent computing was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlkXhpktX0E) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:24, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Shaiguitar, I have reverted your edits that add an external link to your concurrency presentation. The presentation lacks direct relevance to the pages. Self promotion without rigorous justification is discouraged, see -- JamieHanlon (talk). JamieHanlon: I can explain in further detail why the link there exists and how it's relevance to the subject. I apologize for lack of explanation, I am new to Wikipedia edits. Where can I discuss the specifics of this issue? Is here the place to do it?

Hi again Shaiguitar. Here is good a good place to discuss the issue, or in the talk pages of the articles where you had added the external link. I appreciate that your presentation deals with some aspects of concurrency, however, blanket adding it as an external reference to all concurrency-related articles is inappropriate, for the reasons I stated above.