User talk:Shakennotstirred18/sandbox

Carter's Peer Review.

Dearest Darling Carter, Light of my life,

I have reviewed your amazing article on the Waterloo Center for the Arts. I am impressed by your incredible dedication to the Center and all of the research you have done to create such a stellar article. That being said I unfortunately think that your lead section could use a little polishing, though just in the flow of the sentences. When all the sentences within a paragraph begin the same way or have the same structure the paragraph sometimes comes across as monotonous. Also, may I also recommend an additional section containing notable artists? I really enjoy your section on the galleries, I think that was a really great addition. Overall, I am very impressed in the work you have done here!

Love Always, WackyJacky710 (talk) 17:25, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Carter's Second Review
Hello again, beloved Carter,

I have also reviewed the work you have done on the "Avenue Q" article. I will admit, I have not ever heard of such a thing as Avenue Q, however I was happy to learn. Might I say that your contribution, a properly cited characters section, was possibly the most helpful in learning about the musical. I am once again outstandingly impressed with the work you have done for the betterment of musical fools such as myself. While I would normally rather see additions to Wikipedia rephrased instead of simply quoted, I think this is a marvelous place to quote, well done. Also, "Mrs. Thistletwat" lol.

Forever your faithful reviewer, WackyJacky710 (talk) 17:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)