User talk:ShakesJC

September 2014
Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Mad Scientist Party Hour, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 20:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

AfD comment
Hi Shakes, I removed your above comment from the AfD since it was added after the discussion was closed. All article topics on Wikipedia need to have significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) The other hits for Mad Scientist Party Hour might be independent of the main site, but the point is that we don't have enough secondary source coverage to use to write an article. As it stands, the article would rely fully on sites without vetted, editorial control. If we can't find basic secondary coverage, the article topic doesn't have the potential of ever being well researched to a sufficient standard for an encyclopedia article. czar ♔   14:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)