User talk:Shalomjl/Jamaica and The World Bank/Jose Cajero Peer Review

The importance of the topic is clearly shown and concisely presented with additional supporting information incorporated into the main introduction paragraph. The lead paragraph signposts the important points to be made in the following paragraphs and relates to them before further elaborating about these points in the body paragraphs below. There were various embedded links to other relevant pages involving subjects related to Jamaica and its institutions. Your over 10 paragraphs were extensive and detailed and included vast amounts of details that were very informative, as well as structured in such a way that it was easy to follow and understand. Your page is clearly categorized as being under the WB and not confused with the IMF page in any way. The primary sections with the most amount of relevant information are described in the most amount of detail and the length is appropriate. This article has no opinion based language nor does it seem to push the reader towards any agenda it is neutral. The structure that this article was written is very omniciantly stated and is mostly just comprised of factual statements. The well over six sources were authoritative and credible as well as varied. The references were also properly formatted and all listed in the reference section as required, and lastly but most importantly the article was written in plain english in his own words.Jose Cajero (talk) 01:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)