User talk:Shameypie46

Adding poorly sourced, unencyclopedic content, and false claims
Hello, I'm Nqr9. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bros have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. There are a number of issues with your edits: - Your statement "the low chart entry was down to poor promotional carried by Tom Watkins and Bros Managerial Team, Ref CBS Music / Smash Hits Magazine 1988" was removed because this is conjecture, which is not encyclopedic content. Furthermore, you have not referenced correctly. Please take a guide on how to add references to articles correctly. - It doesn't matter whether you're an "experienced music Historian" or not; claims you make, such as worldwide sales figures etc., need to be supported by references to show that the information is reliable. - the reference for Japanese chart peaks cited does not actually display the chart peaks, so cannot be verified as accurate.

Furthermore, you appear to be the same user as Marcus Whitley, as the information you've added to the article is very similar to this user. Why create multiple different accounts when editing the same article/s?Nqr9 (talk) 13:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)