User talk:Shammie62

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Joe Pasquale, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi

I have read the referance link as you suggested, it's not entirely clear what is a reliable source. For example someone has tried to edit Joe Pasquale's article with a fact, which is he worked in a margerine factory in Thurrock Essex. This was not allowed despite the fact that Joe has stated this on TV and within a newspaper for which I provided a link to the newspaper article?
 * A reliable source is essentially one which is considered to be usually correct, such as newspaper articles. (This does not include gossip magazines, however.) Reliable sources also include scholarly journals. Blogs, on the other hand, are usually not reliable sources. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Within Joe Pasquale's article in the section before fame it states that Joe Pasquale dropped out of school at 15. There is absolutly no proof of this whatsoever. Joe Pasquale may or may not have stated this however, Joe left school in May 1977 (Torrels Comp) Buxton Road Grays Essex. As he was one of the youngest of his year he would of course always have left school as a 15 year old, whoever has written that he dropped out of school has not provided any proof.
 * As the article has been fully protected indefinitely, I have requested that the offending content be removed. Thank you for pointing this out. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

As you can see from my previous edits I have largely edited his personal life and other people have changed it and indeed taken this section out. If I wished to add a section about his personal life with factual information in the public domain how would I go about this ? It does appear by the protection of this article that it is aimed at the interests of Joe pasquale. If information can be proven to be true about Joe's personal life will it be allowed regardless or the nature. Also can references be newspaper articles, televised biography and links to a website with pictures of legal documents proving contradictions in his interviews and untruths in some of his claims.
 * The article is fully protected, so you will have to request that an administrator edit it for you by placing on the article's talk page. As mentioned in another of my replies, a newspaper article is a reliable source. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Finally I would state that I edited Joe Pasquale's articles using the truth at all times although I agree references were not used at times. However some information edited is widley known to be the truth and well documented within the media and admitted by Joe Pasquale, an example that Joe has been married twice, divorced once and seperated from his second wife. there is nothing untrue about this statement it is all factual and references can be shown via media links. I would appreciate it if you could give me easy detailed instructions on how to edit the article and what can and cannot be a reference
 * I never said that your additions weren't true; however, all information on Wikipedia must be reliably sourced. If this is well known, then it shouldn't be hard to find some news articles on it! Feel free to request that the article be edited when you have found them. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

thank you


 * Hello! If you don't mind, I'll reply to each paragraph point-by-point. above. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello Eternal Reaper

THANKYOU for the very fast response. I will at a later date request an edit on Joe Pasquale's article and provide references to newspaper articles and see if wikipedia accepts it. If I have any problems I may come back to you hope you don't mind

many thanks

WAYNE HOWARD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.208.253.235 (talk) 08:54, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

February 2012
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to English Defence League. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 14:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Commentry shuld not be placed in the body of an articel, of you have concearns or commetns about content then take it to the talk page.Slatersteven (talk) 14:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, if you wish to discuss the contents of the article, please do so on its talk page.--Pontificalibus (talk) 14:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)