User talk:Shamus248

Welcome!
Hello, Shamus248, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Human Race (Three Days Grace song), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Liam987 (talk)  00:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Human Race (Three Days Grace song)


The article Human Race (Three Days Grace song) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet WP:NSONG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liam987 (talk)  00:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to 1999 Kids' Choice Awards
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 1999 Kids' Choice Awards, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Vítor (talk) 04:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Le Marteau. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jimmy Dore, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Le Marteau (talk) 06:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in The Decision (TV program), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per MOS:NOPIPE, links to redirects generally do not need to be changed to pipes. —Bagumba (talk) 08:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Capitalization
Please check MOS:CAPS / MOS:CT and talk page archives (Talk:Moves like Jagger/Archive 1 and Talk:Moves like Jagger/Archive 1) when considering changes of capitalization, as in this unexplained edit of 22:27, 10 August 2021 (UTC). —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;BarrelProof (talk) 02:42, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Froskurinn. Thank you. – Pbrks (t • c) 05:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, What My World Spins Around, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the access-date parameter in the citation template. The access-date parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ss  112   06:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Spider-Man scientist category
Hello, regarding the Fictional scientists category on the Spider-Man article, I removed the category because the subcategory Category:Marvel Comics scientists is already present, and it is always preferable to use subcategories for a topic as opposed to broader main categories. Therefore, I felt it was necessary to remove Category:Fictional scientists from the article.The Editor 155 (talk) 12:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I didn't add that section? Are you referencing an edit I made? Shamus248 (talk) 16:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I can see from the page history that you reinserted Category:Fictional scientists to the Spider-Man article after I removed it yesterday, so I explained my rationale for removing it in the first place.The Editor 155 (talk) 18:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Yea, I reverted a previous edit of mine that another user had previously undone, which I guess reinserted the fictional scientists category from a prior edit I didn't do myself. Shamus248 (talk) 06:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for clarifying. I will now remove the Fictional scientists category from the page.

February 2023
Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at The Decision (TV program), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Acronyms are generally expanded on first use per MOS:ACRO1STUSE. —Bagumba (talk) 05:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Ummm.....what did i do? Shamus248 (talk) 04:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hey. I've noticed that you kept removing my change to the main photo for the NSYNC article. I've only been changing it because I thought an actual group photo would look better than a collage of the members. I know what I missed the first time and I thought I corrected it with adding the photo author and license, but I guess I missed something. If you could tell me what I missed, I would be willing to fix my mistake and properly replace the photo. Hulkeroni (talk) 11:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * If you can replace the photo, I strongly encourage you to do so. Whenever a collage of the members or the pic of them at the 2013 VMAs gets removed from the info box, I try to undo those edits. The "Image Removal Bot" deleted the 2013 VMA pic so I can't undo that. My edits had nothing to do with your specific edits, I sadly can't control what users or bots delete pics, nor do I know what compels them to do so. I think it's silly that a page of an artist that notable can't have a pic in their infobox without it being a problem. Again, my edits had nothing to do with yours, just merely trying to undo edits by other users/bots that I thought should be undone. Thanks for your time. Shamus248 (talk) 05:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Alright. I completely understand then. I just assumed it was you because it was under your name when I checked the history, so I thought it was you the whole time. I actually never heard of the Image Removal Bot until you brought it up, so thanks for informing me about that. And looking back, it makes sense that it was a bot this whole time. The only problem now is trying to figure out how to replace it with ensuring that the bot won't act up. If you have any ideas, let me know so I could try to implement them. Thanks again. Hulkeroni (talk) 01:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah I wish I had some ideas. The collage of the 5 members is up for now. Hopefully you or someone can upload a group photo without it being a problem. Shamus248 (talk) 19:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Edits to Onision article
Hello. Sorry, but I've had to remove a lot of content you've added to Onision. Per WP:BLP please be very, very careful when citing blogs, youtube videos, tweets etc. for articles on living (or recently deceased) people. Please also be very cautious when citing court documents, per WP:BLPPRIMARY. Using these primary sources to form conclusions about a person's activities is a form of original research (WP:OR) which Wikipedia doesn't publish. Info in articles should summarize reliable sources (WP:RS) which will mainly be independent sources (WP:IS).

Again, sorry. If I had noticed sooner I would've said something sooner and saved you a lot of work. Grayfell (talk) 06:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Admittedly, I am no fan of the subject in question, though my various edits were with the intention to catalog what I believe to be pertinent information. With that being said, is it possible for some of the content to be restored, specifically the court documents and the content therein? I believe it to be very pertinent to the subject. It probably looked like I had labored to put all of that on there, but I honestly didn't mind. Again, it was with the purpose of cataloging things that could get deleted w/o being archived, etc. Let me know if anything can be restored. Thanks for your time. Shamus248 (talk) 06:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I sympathize. Citing court documents often leads to disputes in situations like these. From past experience, my understanding is that the legal action or lawsuit first needs to be supported by an independent source. For any detail not in a a reliable, independent source, there needs to be a clear reason to dip into court documents. Unambiguously important details which the independent source left out for some reason can be added with a court document, for example. I don't really see that here, but I could easily be missing something. The specific details of the accusations will probably need an IS which will also hopefully provide some context. I would accept that a verdict would be slightly easier to summarize than a plaintiff's accusations, but it would still be much, much better to use an independent source even then.
 * Additionally, Rolling Stone's reputation as a reliable sources is complicated per WP:ROLLINGSTONECULTURE/WP:ROLLINGSTONEPOLITICS, so using that as the IS starts off on shaky ground.
 * Some of these incidents are recent enough that reliable sources could be in the works, but that' just a guess. Grayfell (talk) 06:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Take a look at my most recent (and what will be my last for a while if not for good) edit and tell me if that looks okay. I avoided court docs or anything of that sort, and kept it succinct, but again put in what I believed to be important info. Sorry for any trouble. I know I probably looked like a frothing NPC with too much time on his hands. Again, I won't pretend I'm impartial when it comes to Onision, and to be honest I was motivated by a view (in my estimation at least) that his Wikipedia page was generally too sanitized in relation to the allegations made against him, and wanted to catalog them in more explicit detail. Shamus248 (talk) 07:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Vertigo (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Additionally, generally the lead should summarize content found within the body of the article, but nothing in the body of the article, that I saw, discusses the information you added. DonIago (talk) 06:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Spider-Man plot
Hello! I appreciate that you've been giving attention to the Spider-Man page, and have been making good-faith edits. However, next time you revert a large amount of content, please provide a more clear and detailed edit summary. It's not currently clear to me what your concerns are with my edits. Did you find it problematic that I reduced the overall length of the plot summary?

There are several grammatical issues in the current version, but I don't want to edit them until we can have a friendly conversation. Thanks! Wafflewombat (talk) 21:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't have any *issues* with your edits or anyone else's edits. I just thought the plot summary was solid as it was. Shamus248 (talk) 04:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Got it. Would you like me to run the grammatical issues by you before attempting to fix them, or can I go ahead and make edits for you to review? Wafflewombat (talk) 04:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * go ahead Shamus248 (talk) 04:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)