User talk:ShanGuy37

May 2019
Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm Dewritech. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dictatorship seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Dewritech (talk)  17:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benevolent dictatorship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arab Socialist Union. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2011 England riots, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irish and Scottish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Communist rebellion in the Philippines, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Specifically MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. FDW777 (talk) 13:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Battle of Misrata. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.

Again, re these edits, please read, understand and follow MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. FDW777 (talk) 22:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.

Again, regarding edits such as this. Please read, understand, and follow MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE, specifically the purpose of an infobox is to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article. FDW777 (talk) 12:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style.

Again, edits such as this are against MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. You have never posted to an article's talk page, nor have you posted to a user talk page or Wikipedia page. I strongly suggest you start communicating. FDW777 (talk) 17:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Once again I refer you to MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. You can either follow this and start communicating about issues with your edits, or I'll take this to WP:ANI. You choose. FDW777 (talk) 20:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vaush. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SWinxy (talk) 23:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Anderson (British politician), you may be blocked from editing. Robby.is.on (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Communitarianism
Hi ShanGuy37. Sorry to have to revert you again, but the reference you addex "Taylor 2005" is meaningless unless you have a fully formatted cite elsewhere in the article explaining what work that refers to. The same went for "Beiser 2005" that you previously added. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 17:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brownism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labour Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding another editor's repeated restoration of contentious material without discussion. The thread is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Nomoskedasticity_and_Douglas_Murray. Thank you. FirstPrimeOfApophis (talk) 19:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
 Prodraxis  ( talk ) 19:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)