User talk:ShanPitt/sandbox

In the igneous and hydrothermal section, the second sentence is a run on. What is meant by force at the end of that sentence? It is unclear. South China block? Also state only what is known, there is no need to say some things remain a mystery.

You only need one period after the citation number, not before and after. In the second last sentence the uranium bearing pegmatites don’t sound tied to any deposit. If they are a part of the McDermitt Caldera remove the comma after pegmatites. Perhaps use “widespread” instead of “disseminated” so the common reader can better understand.

Sources 7-10 can be combined by highlighting the word, in this case breccia pipe, and then clicking the link symbol and typing in the wiki page. This will allow for the word to become the quick link and you can use it multiple times. A lot of the information in the breccia section is being repeated from the breccia pipe page. It should just be mentioned once and more information should be added as to how uranium is found in these pipes, where it comes from, and how it is extracted.

These may help you get started on the breccia section.

The first link works but the second and third link don’t. Perhaps double check the information entered to create the links.

For the most part the language is good and easy to understand. There is heavy use of the few references cited. Cleaning those up and adding more would give the article better coverage on the subject, while also giving it a more neutral standpoint. Mickinahan (talk) 01:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review; Great job developing these subsections, you provide a lot of good information though try using some more sources to support them. JazChapman (talk) 02:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)