User talk:Shane-m-mcmillan

Speedy deletion of Wintermitts
A tag has been placed on Wintermitts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 04:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 04:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Section from deleted talk page
Please don't delete! The article is not complete yet. If after a week you still find it irrelevant, then go ahead and delete, but please wait until all the information is up!

Thanks, Shane Shane-m-mcmillan (talk) 04:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think it should really take a week to demonstrate whether or not someone is notable. And as far as I can tell, this band doesn't meet a single WP:MUSIC notability criteria. Are any of those applicable to them at all? - Vianello (talk) 04:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Agreed. The assertions of notability and citations to independent sources should go up first. You shouldn't even be putting up a stub until you can put that information in. —C.Fred (talk) 04:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * ...And blogs are not reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 04:17, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nor demonstrations of notability. - Vianello (talk) 04:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)