User talk:ShaneRothko101

Block
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Diannaa - was unaware of that policy but once you mentioned it, that makes sense. Have changed username accordingly.

Regard
 * That username is taken. Please choose another. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Good morning, Just hoping that the article I created which was in sandbox is in the right place to make it a draft for approval. Not sure if i've done it right. Thanks for your advice. UCTGSB 06:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Baets (November 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walter Baets and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Walter_Baets Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Walter_Baets reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  06:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Baets (November 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walter Baets and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Walter_Baets Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Walter_Baets reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  09:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Dear SwisterTwister, please advise. We were able to get the Walter Baets page up and approved a few months ago. Then it emerged that the uploader had not disclosed that it was paid-for work in uploading, so Wikipedia took it down. Now second time around, we made the correct disclosures and used the same content, except better with more references and now it doesn't make the grade? Very confusing. Would appreciate your help. I'll try and find more sources but, as I say, it was good enough once before so not sure what else to look for.

Thank you