User talk:Shanesterman

You are free to express yourself in this talk page but please dont use this page to write nonsenseShanesterman (talk) 19:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

June 2006
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at British National Party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-- Snowded TALK  14:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on United States. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan (talk)  19:25, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

While your intentions appear to be honorable, sad to say both your English skills and general compositional skills are evidently poor. Please do not attempt to rewrite the opening of the United States article unless and until you achieve consensus on the article's Talk page for doing so. Thank you. Any further attempts to rewrite the lead in the absence of such consensus will simply be reverted. DocKino (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2011 (UTC)