User talk:Shaneymike/Archive 2015-2017

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Armoury Show
Template:The Armoury Show has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lachlan Foley (talk) 11:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fathom that.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fathom that.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Fathom that.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fathom that.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Morrissey singles


A tag has been placed on Template:Morrissey singles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Feltlike.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Feltlike.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Disgracelandcov.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Disgracelandcov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Cure singles
Template:The Cure singles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. FamblyCat94 (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

New policy
Could you tell me about the policy alluded to in your recent edit summary on Japanese Whispers? Just want to be up-to-speed. Thanks! —jameslucas (" " / +) 02:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I've been away for a while but now I'm back contributing on a more regular basis. In the past, it was my understanding that we had separate chains for studio, live, and compilation albums. I tried implementing that policy with the My Chemical Romance discography this week but a user by the name of Yeepsi changed them back with this edit summary: Per Template:Infobox_album#Chronology: "all albums and EPs should be placed in a single, chronological chain in order of release date".
 * See here
 * So now I'm going around to the various articles where I did what I was once told years ago (User_talk:Shaneymike/Archive_4) and put separate chains for studio, live, and compilation albums and instead put them all on one chain. Hope this clarifies things. Shaneymike (talk) 03:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Katie Chapman (voice actress)


The article Katie Chapman (voice actress) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * fails to meet the relevant notability guidelines and cannot be attributed to reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kingstoken (talk) 15:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I have no objection to this article's deletion. In fact, I'd delete it myself if I was an admin. There are a couple articles of mine that I plan on redirecting at some point. Shaneymike (talk) 21:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lovesgentlemaw.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lovesgentlemaw.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Re Wallflower (My Sister's Machine album)
I am not suggesting that this, or other articles, should go. I have no opinion on that and have not suggested deletion. What is needed, as the notability message states, is an indication of why the album is notable, backed up with independent reliable sources. The fact that an album exists is not enough - not every album is notable. The purpose of the tag is to bring this to editors' attention and to give people an opportunity to add relevant information, such as significant awards or chart positions, that show notability.

If you haven't already, you might want to take a look at the relevant notability guidelines which give information on the sort of evidence that would be useful. If you can add any such detail, it is OK to remove the notability tag.

Another option would be to merge that album's article into the article on the band. This has been done in other cases (and it does, of course, require the band itself to be notable!).

This is not my area of expertise - you clearly know more about this band and its albums than I, so you are probably better placed to find and add the relevant evidence. Hope this helps. Emeraude (talk) 09:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Depeche Mode
Only the studio albums have to be included in the infobox for "previous album" and "next record". But you had included here and here compilations, greatest hits etc... in the case of the next record. You did that on many DM studio album articles. Please don't repeat this at any studio album articles. Thanks. Woovee (talk) 18:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Oliver for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Oliver is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mark Oliver until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 11:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Adding 's's...
FYI, MOS:POSS indicates that there are multiple correct ways do denote the plural of a noun ending in s. The edit summaries surrounding your recent changes to Game of Thrones episodes indicate you may not be aware of this. Not a big deal, and I won't be changing things back, but someone else might, since that is how the articles had been for years. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 22:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I am aware that not everybody are adding an "s" after the apostrophe when the noun itself ends with an "s" even though it's singular. While I personally think that looks awkward and find it a bit frustrating, I won't get into any edit wars if someone, especially an admin changes it back.--Shaneymike (talk) 22:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kmg365albumcov.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Kmg365albumcov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lovesgentlemaw.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lovesgentlemaw.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adam Henderson


The article Adam Henderson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. BangJan1999 20:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Please share your thoughts
There's an ongoing discussion on AiC talk page regarding a haphazard and disruptive editing by the user 4TheWynne. Please share your thoughts. --Oderinnn (talk) 11:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fathom That cover art.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fathom That cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Lalainia Lindbjerg for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lalainia Lindbjerg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lalainia Lindbjerg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Peace and silence.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Peace and silence.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 13 December 2017 (UTC)