User talk:Shang2

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 20:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard "Jesus" Hopkins


A tag has been placed on Richard "Jesus" Hopkins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Awsome EBE123(talk | Contribs) 20:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Hopkins (chess player)


The article Richard Hopkins (chess player) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This individual does not seem to meet the notabillity requirements, specifically WP:BIO. There is only one reference, and I am unable to locate other appropriate reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Chzz  ► 22:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

User page
Note that I have removed overly-identifying information from your userpage - this has been done in order to protect your privacy. Additional information can be found here. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Richard Hopkins (chess player), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 20:02, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Hopkins (chess player). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 20:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rick Hinderer Knives


A tag has been placed on Rick Hinderer Knives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 02:23, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Thx
Thx for the brownie! I am not Roman, I just thought the Richard Hopkins article is an interesting little article. p.s. I also play violin, am not religious, like NOVA (sciences). Cheers, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 10:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Republic of China article
Since you said on your user page that you are from the Republic of China, I guess you are interested to share your view at Talk:Republic of China#Requested Move (February 2012). Thanks for your attention. 61.18.170.10 (talk) 12:31, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard Hopkins (chess player) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Hopkins (chess player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Richard Hopkins (chess player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Cactus Writer (talk) 01:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating nonsense pages. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Cactus Writer (talk) 02:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)